clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 761   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

29 CAR. 2, CAP. 3, STATUTE OF FRAUDS. 761
horse remained a fortnight with* the plaintiff; it was held that this 558
was a sufficient acceptance. But other cases have occurred, such as Carter
v. Toussaint, 5 B. & A. 855, and Tempest v. Fitzgerald, 3 B. & A. 680,
where the sale being for cash, and the buyer gaining no right of property
till the price was paid, or where nothing being said about the price the
seller could not be compelled to deliver until he had received the price,
it was determined that, as he had not parted with his possession or control
over the horses, there was no actual acceptance or receipt by the pur-
chaser. In Atwell v. Miller, 6 Md. 10, the defendant purchased in January
sundry bales of linens of the plaintiffs, which were at once set aside and
marked with his name. Afterwards the defendant wrote a letter to the
plaintiffs, asking for a bill of the linens. Subsequently, in the ensuing
fall, the plaintiffs' clerk called on the defendant and had a conversation
with him about the bill of the linens which were still in the plaintiffs'
warehouse, and the defendant then requested the plaintiffs to sell the goods
for him on his account and risk, and try and save him from loss. The
verdict was for the plaintiffs, and the Court said that if it stood upon
the evidence in regard to a delivery they would not be disposed to disturb
it; and see Castles v. Sworder supra. Constructive delivery is a mixed
question of law and fact, but the circumstances necessary to constitute
such a delivery must be found by the jury as in case of an actual delivery,
ibid.; and there, as in Hall v. Richardson, some reliance seems to have been
placed on the circumstances of designating the goods for the use of the
purchaser by marking and removing them; and Hodgson v. Lebret, 1
Camp. 233, and Anderson v. Scott, ibid. n. are relied on in the latter case.
But the former of these cases has been overruled by Baldey v. Parker
supra, and the latter disapproved in Proctor v. Jones, 2 C. & P. 532, and
Saunders v. Topp supra.
In Thompson v. B. & O. R. R. Co. 28 Md. 396, a sale was made of a
quantity of iron lying at a furnace and on the road, the different parcels
of which were pointed out by the agent of the vendor to the agent of the
vendee, and the whole charged to the vendee by his agent, under the direc-
tion of the vendor, with the intention of making a delivery, and it was
held sufficient, regard being had to that intention and the subject-matter
of the contract. The Court went on to observe that where the goods are
ponderous, &c., marking, measuring, weighing, &c., are held to amount to
a constructive delivery, but the only reason why such acts are required
is to identify the goods sold, for if they are capable of being identified
without these acts, and by the contract of sale are identified, the title
passes. But this belongs to a distinct head of the contract of sale.
It was further remarked in the same case, in the language of Shaw C. J.
in Arnold v. Delano, 4 Cush. 38, that there is a marked distinction between
those acts, which as between vendor and vendee upon a contract of sale
go to make a constructive delivery and vest the property in the vendee,
and that actual delivery by the vendor which puts an end to his right to
hold the goods as a security for the price; and as to a sale on credit, the
law, in holding that a vendor who has given credit for goods waives his
lien for the price, does so on one implied condition, viz: that the vendee
shall keep his credit good. If, therefore, before payment the vendee became
bankrupt or insolvent, and the vendor still retains the custody of the

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 761   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  Cannot perform flastmod(): Win32 Error Code = 2

Maryland State Archives