clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 724   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

724 29 CAR. 2, CAP. 3, STATUTE OF FRAUDS.
much per acre, to be dug and carried away by the purchaser, with no re-
striction as to time; in Sainsbury v. Matthews, 4 M. & W. 343, they were
growing and were sold at so much a sack, to be dug by the purchaser at
the usual time and paid for then; in Evans v. Roberts, 5 B. & C. 829, a
leading case, they were growing and were sold by the cover, to be turned
up by the seller; and in all these cases the contract was held not within
this section; and so of a crop of growing wheat, Mayfield v. Wadsley, 8
B. & C. 367. In Jones v. Flint, 11 A. & E. 753, the agreement (by parol)
was that the defendant should give a certain sum for the crops of growing
corn on the plaintiff's land, and the profit of the stubble afterwards; the
plaintiff's cattle were to run with the defendant's, and the defendant was to
have some potatoes growing on the land, and whatever lay-grass was in the
fields, he to harvest the corn and dig the potatoes, and the plaintiff to
533 pay the tithes. It was determined that the intention of* the
parties did not appear to be to contract for an interest in land, and the
agreement therefore, was not within this section, but a contract for the
sale of goods and chattels as to all but the lay-grass, and as to that,
since the plaintiff did not part with the possession of the soil, a contract
for the agistment of the defendant's cattle; and Evans v. Roberts was
approved, and any distinction between crops, ripe and unripe, and be-
tween cases where the buyer and where the seller was to take the crops
was denied. Where land had been let by parol to the defendant, from
which he was to take two successive crops and give the plaintiff a moiety
of them as the rent, and an appraisement of the crops of the second year
was made while they were in the ground, in an action brought on the re-
fusal of the defendant to pay half the value so ascertained, it was held
that, the price having been ascertained by the appraisement, the case was
brought to that of an action for goods sold and delivered, Poulter v. Kil-
lenbeck, 1 B. & P. 397. However, where a landlord agreed by parol to
let a farm, the tenant to take the growing crops and pay for them, and
also for the labor and materials for preparing the land for tillage, accord-
ing to a valuation, it was decided that as the crops were growing and
the tenant was to have them and the land also, and the labour and materials
were so incorporated with as to be inseparable from it, the case was
within this section, Earl Falmouth v. Thomas, 1 Cr. & M. 89. In other
words, where the land is agreed to be sold and the purchaser takes the
growing crops, they are considered part of the land.
On the other hand, an agreement for the sale of growing grass to be
mowed and made into hay by the purchaser, being a contract for the
vesture of the land, and conferring an exclusive right to the land for a
time to make a profit of the surface, must be in writing, Crosby v. Wards-
worth, 6 East, 602; Carrington v. Roots, 2 M. & W. 248. And the same
has been held on the same principle as to a contract for the sale of grow-
ing poles. Teal v. Auty, 2 Brod. & Bing. 99; growing underwood, Scovell
v. Boxall, 1 Y. & J. 396; and growing fruit, Rodwell v. Phillips, 9 M. & W.
501, where they were to be gathered and cut by the purchasers. But an
agreement to sell standing timber at so much a foot, to be cut by the
seller, was held not a contract for the sale of lands, &c., for the object
of the party who sells timber is not to give the vendee any interest; in
his lands, but to give him an interest in the trees when they become goods

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 724   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  Cannot perform flastmod(): Win32 Error Code = 2

Maryland State Archives