clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 681   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

19 CAR. 2, CAP. 6, PRESUMPTION OF DEATH. 681
Presumption of death.—In Thomas v. Visitors, &c. supra, it was urged in
argument, that the Statute and the rule that has prevailed in analogy to
it applied only to absence of a party from his own country, and could not
apply to his non-appearance for the same period in a foreign country; and
as the relations of the intestate there were foreigners, there could be no
presumption of their death. Two of the judges dissented from the opinion
of the majority. However this may be, the presumption of the continu-
ance of life, it is now held with respect to persons hewing gone abroad,
or absent from their usual places of residence, and of whom no account
can be given, ceases, in general, for all legal and equitable purposes (Tilly
v. Tilly, 2 Bl. 436), at the expiration of seven years from the time they
were last known to be living. Doe v. Jesson, 6 East, 80; Hopewell v.
DePinna, 2 Camp. 113, on a plea of coverture; Doe v. Deakins, 4 B. &
A. 433. In the latter case it was held, that the fact of a tenant for life
not having been seen or heard of for fourteen years by a person residing
near the estate, although not one of the family, was prima facie evidence
of his death. The probability, said the Court, is that as he was entitled
to the property he would come into the neighborhood to claim it; any of
the family may* be called to rebut the presumption, and if he be 503
still alive he may recover possession from the lessors of the plaintiff.
Ground* and extent of presumption of death.—The grounds as well as
the extent of this presumption are very clearly laid down in Nepean v.
Doe, 2 M. & W. 910, (see Doe v. Nepean, 5 B. & Ad. 86). There the lessor
of the plaintiff claimed as grantee in reversion of certain copyholds on
the death of one Mat. Knight, who went to America in Dec. 1806 or early
in 1807, and the last heard of him was by a letter written by him and
received in England in May 1807. The declaration in ejectment was
served on the 18th Jan. 1834. Lord Denman said, "where a person goes
abroad and is not heard of for seven years, the law presumes the fact that
such person is dead, but not that he died at the beginning or end of any
particular period during those seven years, and if it be important to
any one to establish the precise time of such person's death, he must do
so by evidence of some sort, to be laid before the jury for that purpose,
beyond the mere lapse of seven years since that person was last heard of.
The law presumes that a person shown to be alive at a given time remains
alive until the contrary is shown, for which reason the onus of showing the
death of Mat. Knight lay in this case on the lessor of the plaintiff. He
has shown the death by proving the absence of Mat. Knight, and his not
having been heard of for seven years, whence arises at the end of those
seven years another presumption of law, viz: that he was not then alive.
But the onus is also east on the plaintiff of showing that he has com-
menced his action within twenty years after his right of action accrued,
i. e. after the actual death of Mat. Knight. Now when nothing is heard
of a person for seven years, it is obviously a matter of complete uncer-
tainty at what point of time in those seven years he died. Of all points
of time the last day is the most improbable and most inconsistent with
the ground of presuming the fact of death. That presumption arises from
the great lapse of time since the party has been heard of, because it is
considered extraordinary that, if he was alive, he should not be heard of.
In other words, it is presumed that his not being heard of has been oc-

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 681   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives