Volume 194, Page 670 View pdf image (33K) |
6,70 17 CAR. 2, CAP. 7, REPLEVIN. and of the value of the goods distrained, and thereupon the defendant is entitled to final judgment for the arrearages of such rent, if the goods be of that value, or to the value of the goods if less than the rent. Where the plaintiff is nonsuit at the trial, or there is a verdict against him, the same jury find the arrearages and value of the goods, nor is it necessary that the avowant should pray that they should do so, Dorsey v. Hays, 7 H. & J. 370, and, as has been said, there can be no judgment under the Statute if the jury do not find both; see also Sheape v. Culpepper, 1 Lev. 256. But the Statute relates to rent-arrear only, and therefore, in other cases, an enquiry may be granted to supply omissions of the jury at the trial, see Dewell v. Marshall, 2 W. Black. 921, where there was a defec- tive verdict in replevin for distress on a poor-rate; and so in the case of an avowry for distress damage feasant, Humphreys v. Misdale, Comb. 11. In case of the avowant succeeding on demurrer, the act only requires an inquiry of the value of the distress (saying nothing of the arrearages), the reason being that the demurrer admits the amount of rent to be as stated in the avowry. Pool v. Longuevill, 2 Wms. Saund. 286, n. 5. But, in other cases, the defendant should be prepared to prove to the jury both the amount in arrear and the value of the goods, and that the plaintiff was in possession during the time for which rent is claimed. It lies with the latter to prove that any of the rent has been paid. In the index to the notes to Wms. Saund. will be found a table of the pro- ceedings in such cases, which it may be convenient to copy here. In case of demurrer found for defendant:
|
|||||||
Volume 194, Page 670 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.