| Volume 194, Page 589 View pdf image (33K) |
|
21 JAC. 1, CAP. 12, GENERAL ISSUE. 539 to the officer, and it is no cause of error that there is no such previous oath, Anon. Cro. Car. 316; Leigh v. Kent supra. Stat. 4 Ann. c. 16, s. 5, did not extend to penal actions, Morgan v, Lackup, 2 Str. 1044, recognized in Heyrick v. Foster, 4 T. R. 701; but the Code, Art. 75, sec. 10,3 provides that the defendant in any action may plead as many several matters as he may think necessary, see Bac. Abr. Action qui tarn, D. The plaintiff in declaring must negative the exemptions or exceptions in the enacting clause giving the penalty, or in any other clause to which the enacting clause refers, but not those contained in a subsequent proviso to which the enacting clause does not refer, nor those contained in a subse- quent statute; the defendant in these cases must bring himself within the exempting proviso, Steel v. Smith, 1 B. & A. 94; R. v. Pratten, 6 T. R. 559; Van Boven's case, 9 Q. B. 684, per Erie J.; Pilkington v. Cooke, 16 M. & W. 615; Rawlins v. the State, 2 Md. 201, and cases there cited; Kellen- beek v. The State, 10 Md. 431; Franklin v. The State, 12 Md. 236; Parkin- son v. The State, 14 Md. 184.4 However a saving proviso may be given in evidence on the general issue, Pelly v. Rose, 12 M. & W. 435; and see note to 4 H. 7, c. 20. The 4th section, by which defendants are permitted to plead the general issue and give the special matter in evidence, it is held, however, does apply to penal actions given by subsequent Statutes, see Earl Spencer v. Swan- nell, 3 M. & W. 154; Jones v. Williams, 4 M. & W. 154, an action of debt on 11 Geo. 2, c. 19, s. 4. See 1 Wms. Saund. 38 b, Jones v. Pope, in notis. 3 Code 1911, Art. 75, sec. 10, (as now amended). * See Barber v. State, 50 Md. 161; Lamb v. State, 67 Md. 541; Steams v. State, 81 Md. 841. CAP. XII. 439 An Act to enlarge and make perpetual the Act made for Ease in Pleading, against troublesome and contentions Suits prosecuted against Justices of the Peace, Mayors, Constables and certain other his Majesty's Officers, for the lawful Execution of their Office, made in the seventh Year of his Majesty's most happy Reign. Whereas an Act, intituled An Act for Ease in Pleading, against troublesome and contentious Suits prosecuted against Justices of the Peace, Mayors, Constables, and certain, other his Majesty's Officers, for the lawful Execution of their Office, made in the seventh Year of his Majesty's most happy Reign of England, was made to continue but for seven Years, and from thence to the end of the next Parliament after the said seven Years, which by Experience hath since been found to be a good and profitable Law: |
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 194, Page 589 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.