clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 56   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

56 52 H. 3, CAP. 4, DISTRESS.
Excessive distress**—Remedies.—The preceding Statute provides that dis-
tresses shall be reasonable, &c., and excessive distresses are said to have
been illegal at common law. However it has been held that a man is not
liable to an indictment for taking an excessive distress, R. v Ledgingham, 1
Mod. 288, the remedy being in general by an action on the Statute, Hutchins
v. Chambers, 1 Burr. 679, except where, as in Moir v, Munday cited ibid.
590, a distress of 6 ounces of gold and 100 ounces of silver was taken for
6s. 8d. which appeared upon the face of it and upon the pleadings to be
excessive, gold and silver being of a certain known value, and trespass was
adjudged to lie, see Crowther v. Ramsbottom, 7 T. R. 654. If to the taking
of the excessive distress there is added a distinct trespass in turning a
man out of his house, or if the excessive distress be abused, it is a separate
cause of action, Etherton v. Popplewell, 1 East, 149; Lynne v. Moody, 1
Str. 851. And if there has been a tender of the rent, the plaintiff may
bring either case or trespass, Branscomb v. Brydes, 2 Dowl. & R. 256; S. C.
1 B. & C. 145; Holland v. Bird, 10 Bing. 15. It appears too that if the
plaintiff have recovered in replevin he cannot afterwards bring an action on
the Statute, for the recovery in replevin shews that there was no cause of
distress, and moreover damages were recoverable in the replevin for the
taking, Phillips v. Berryman, 3 Doug. 286, and see 2 Inst. 107.
The landlord need not calculate nicely the value of the distress, but must
observe some proportion between its value and the amount of rent dis-
trained for, Willoughby v. Backhouse, 2 B. & C. 821. A trifling excess will
not render the distrainor liable under the Statute. The distress is to be
reasonable, says the Act. Thus if the landlord distrain an ox or a horse for
43 a penny, if there were no other distress on the* land it is not exces-
sive, but if there were sheep or swine then such taking is excessive because
there were beasts of less value, 2 Inst. 107; otherwise if he distrain two or
three oxen for 12d. or the like small sum, ibid. So taking a single chattel,
where the distrainor had no opportunity of taking but that one, was held
not to be excessive though of greater value than the rent due, Avenell v.
Croker, Moo. & Malk. 172, see Field v. Mitchell, 6 Esp. 71, and Clarke v.
Tucket, 2 Ventr. 182, where it is said that a cart and horses may be dis-
trained for even a small demand, for they are not severable. The general
rule may be laid down to be, that if the landlord take an unreasonable quan-
tity or number of goods beyond what would produce the rent and expenses
at such a sale as is usually made of a distress, it will be deemed excessive,
and being so excessive the plaintiff may recover the fair value of them,
Wells v. Moody, 7 C. & P. 59. Corn or hay, loose and growing corn or other
products are within the Statute, if an unreasonable quantity of such sub-
jects are taken, either alone or conjointly with other chattels, but though
the landlord is liable to some damages in this case, for the probable produce
of growing crops may be estimated at the time of seizure, the measure of
damages will not be their full value beyond what ought to have been taken,
but compensation for the additional expense of the distress and of keeping
possession of that part of the crops which it was unnecessary to distrain
during the time of possession, and some compensation for the loss of the
absolute ownership and power of disposition over them for the same time,
and for the expense the tenant is put to in replevying to a larger amount, if

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 56   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives