clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 467   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

32 H. 8, CAP. 34, COVENANTS. 467
not, he is liable to the extent of its value and all the other assets. But he
may avoid personal liability by pleading properly that he is only assignee
by being executor, and that he never entered, and he may avoid his lia-
bility as executor by pleading that the term is of no value and plene admin-
istravit; however this exception does not extend to a covenant for repairs,
Dean, &c. of Bristol v. Guyse, 1 Wms. Saund. Ill a. et seq. n. c. If an
executor assents to a bequest of leasehold premises and gives up possession,
he cannot afterwards maintain ejectment for the estate, though he con-
tinued to live with the legatee upon it after the assent, Cole's lessee v. Cole,
1 H. & J. 572.
Assignee* of reversion.—With respect now to assignees of the reversion.
In Kitchen and Knight v. Buckly, 1 Lev. 109, where the plaintiffs, tenants
in common, brought a joint action against the defendant for not repairing
a messuage according to his covenant, and one point moved in arrest of
judgment was that the covenant was not with the lessor and his assignees,
and therefore his assignees, the plaintiffs, should not have any action, not
being named, the Court held in accordance with the argument of Jones for
the plaintiff, that as an assignee of a lessee shall be charged in covenant
for repairs, though assignees are not named in the covenant, in respect of
his having the possession, so an assignee of the reversion shall have an
action of covenant for default of repairs in respect of his having the rever-
sion, though assignees are not named in the covenant; and judgment for
plaintiffs. So a person taking under a will a reversion of 1000 years for
life, and after to his son and the heirs of bis body, may bring covenant for
non-repair against a lessee, the devise of the term being held to pass the
whole estate, and the remainder to the son being but a possibility and an
executory devise, Dowse v. Cole, 2 Vent. 126; Home v. Lyeth, 4 H. & J. 435,
ace. So if there be a devise to one for life, with remainder to another for
life, with power to them successively to lease, a covenant by a lessee with
the first tenant for life, his heirs and assigns, (under a lease made by him)
to pay rent, &c., to the lessor and such other person as should be entitled to
the freehold will pass under the statute to the remainderman, Isherwood v.
Oldknow, 3 M. & S. 382. In Greenaway v. Hart, 14 C. B. 340, a lease, made
under a power contained in a settlement, recited the lessor's title and
shewed that he had only an equitable estate; the covenants in the lease
and a right of re-entry for a breach of them were reserved to the lessor,
his heirs and assigns, and it was held that assigns meant assigns of the
settlor, and although the right of re-entry could not be well reserved to the
lessor, who had no legal estate, yet that the owners of the reversion under the
settlement for the time being were entitled to the advantage of it as assigns,
and the covenants enured in their favour; from which it appears that such
words, limiting, or otherwise restricting the reservation of the covenants
contrary to the plain intent of the instrument, may be rejected. An impor-
tant authority on the subject also is Cuthbertson v. Irving, 4 Hurl. & N.
742, which was a case of a lease by a mortgagor in possession to the
defendant, the covenants being made with the mortgagor, his heirs and as-
signs. He assigned, by apt words, all his interest to the plaintiff in fee simple,
who brought covenant for breach of a covenant to repair. The assignment to
the plaintiff disclosed* the mortgage, which shewed that the legal 354
estate was in a trustee, and the assignment was made by the mortgagor
alone. The Court treated it as settled that the assignee of a lessor by deed,

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 467   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives