clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 454   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

454 32 H. 8, CAP. 34, COVENANTS.
pleaded as to a part of this, viz. as to so much as complained in respect
of a water corn-mill, &c., erected and built during the term, and shewed
that they were buildings erected during the term, and not erected in place
of others previously existing. It was contended that this plea was good
on the authority of Spencer's case, the lessee not having covenanted for
his assigns.
"The state of the authorities in question seems as follows;—the propo-
sition that a covenant which would run with the land, if the assignee were
named, does not where he is not named, and the thing was not in esse
at the time of making the covenant, is laid down in Spencer's case. The
same is to be found in Comyn's Digest, Cov't (C.) 3, citing Spencer's ease
and Jones, 223, which, however, does not support the doctrine. It is not
found in Rolle. It is in Viner's Abridgement, Covenant (L), where, how-
ever, Moor. 159, is cited as establishing the same, when in truth it es-
tablished the contrary. It is negatively sanctioned by the silence of the
author and editors of Smith's Leading Cases, and it is cited in Daughty
v. Bowman, 11 Q. B. 444, where, however, with submission it was inap-
plicable. There the question was if an assignee of the reversion was
bound, which depends on different considerations: 1 Wms. Saund. 241 d.
In Sheppard's Touchstone, 180, it is thus put, 'if the lessee covenant for
himself, or for himself, his executors or administrators only to build a new
house upon the land, the assignee is not bound;' the editor adds, because he
is not named. In page 179, Spencer's case is cited, but the ease put is of a
new house. A similar remark applies to Cockson v. Cock, Cro. Jac. 125,
where a covenant to build de novo is called collateral. But it may be not
unreasonably said that to build a new house does not 'extend to the sup-
port of the thing demised.' Indeed Lord Coke thought it waste; Co. Litt.
53 a. On the other hand, Moor. p. 159, pL 300, (which is evidently
Spencer's case, though the date is later,) gives the decision the other way.
The explanation may be that Lord Coke is reporting a variety of argu-
ments and opinions expressed, while Moor gives the ultimate decision.
Smith v. Arnold, 3 Salk. 4, is directly contrary; and in Bally v. Wells, 3
Wils. 25, the contrary is stated. No reason is given for the alleged dif-
ference between where the assignee is and is not named; on the contrary
the reason given for binding in any case an assignee not named, viz. that
he takes the benefit and burthen, seems equally to apply to every such
case. No doubt if the law were clearly laid down without contradiction,
it ought to be abided by, though no reason could be given for it. ... But
in deciding which of two conflicting sets of authorities is correct, it is
not irrelevant to look at the reason of the thing. No doubt the resolu-
tion in Spencer's case has been repeatedly cited, or the same thing said
345 as is said there, but that resolution is the foundation of the
opinion; it never appears to have been acted on; on the contrary Moor.
159, and Smith v. Arnold are decisions the other way." The Court, how-
ever, thought it sufficient to decide the case on the ground above stated.
If, however, the assignee be named there is no doubt of his liability in
such cases.
In Sampson v. Easterby, 9 B. & C. 505, 8 Bing. 644, S. C. in error in
the Exchequer Chamber, there was a lease from A. to B. of an undivided
third part of a mine, and B. covenanted, for himself and his assigns,

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 454   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives