clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 434   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

434 32 H- 8. CAP- S0. JEOFAILS.
must show the party entitled to the action brought, but in the same case,
where the declaration averred that the defendant covenanted, without say-
ing, under seal, and the defendant pleaded over, it was held that a sealed
instrument was admissible in evidence as the contract declared on, and
that the defect was one of form at best, and see Felty v. Young, 18 Md. 163.
It was determined in Baynham's case, 5 Rep. 36, that this Act did not
extend to any fault in the original or in the return thereof, or to the want
of an original, or to any insufficiency in the trial, verdict or judgment. So
it has also been held that where there was a special issue, and an issue of
not guilty, the substance was upon the special matter found, and accord-
ingly if the issue be not well joined upon that, it is not helped by verdict,
The King v. Hopper, Cro. Jac. 598. And it appears that an assessment of
damages for the avowant by a jury on a nonsuit in replevin is but an
inquest of office and no trial, and therefore not within this Statute, Ire-
land's case, Cro. Eliz. 339. So, too, an issue of nul tiel record is not within
the Act, Sir John Heydon's case, 11 Rep. 8 a. If a material allegation is
traversed in an improper manner, an issue taken upon it will be merely
informal and cured by verdict for either party, as in Bennet v. Holbech,
2 Wms. Saund. 316. So in Cobb v. Bryan, 3 B. & P. 348, to an avowry for
120;. rent in arrear, the plaintiff pleaded that the 120;. were not due, on
which the defendant joined issue, and at the trial it appeared that only 241.
were due, whereupon the plaintiff objected that the evidence did not sup-
port the issue, but it was held though the objection was taken at the trial,
that a verdict for 24l cured the informality of the issue. And so if the
plaintiff joins issue by the defendant's name, or vice versa, it is aided by
verdict, Blackamore's case, 8 Rep. 161 b; so if the defendant plead not
guilty instead of lion assumpsit, Corbyn v. Brown, Cro. Eliz. 470; and see
Hall v. Bonythan, Cro. Jac. 550, a mistake of the month in joining the
issue. In Nichols' case, 5 Rep. 42 a, the defendant pleaded payment of a
specialty without acquittance, and after verdict for the plaintiff it was
held to be helped by this Statute and 18 Eliz., though the specialty still
remained in force, for there was a good affirmative and negative issue.
In Tyson v. Richard, 3 H. & J. 109, where issue was not joined on two
replications that had been pleaded, but had been joined on a third, on
which there was a verdict for the plaintiff, the defect was held to be cured
by the verdict, and see Scott v. Lancaster, 3 H. & J. 441. So in Berresford
v. Geddes, 2 L. R. C. P. 285, where the declaration contained two counts,
330 on one of which issue was joined, and on* the other there was no
complete issue, which however was stricken out at the trial, and the cause
proceeded to trial, and the plaintiff had a verdict upon the count on which
issue was joined, it was held that, under this Statute, the fact of there
having been on the record another count, as to which there was no perfect
issue, would not have invalidated the verdict upon the issue properly
joined. And so a plaintiff, in whose favor judgment had been rendered on
a demurrer, was suffered to join in demurrer at a term after the judgment
and the record was amended for the purpose, Brown v. Jones' adm'r, 10 G.
& J. 334. And see Ragan v. Gaither, 11 G. & J. 472. But if no issue is
joined in the pleadings or an immaterial issue, the judgment will be
reversed and a repleader awarded, Martin v. Garrett, 7 H. & J. 272;

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 434   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives