clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 401   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

27 H. 8, CAP. 10, USES. 401
vise, she shall not thereby be barred, whether she renounce or not, "it being
the intent of this Article and consonant to justice, that a widow, accepting
or abiding by a devise in lieu of her legal right, shall be considered as a
purchaser with a fair consideration."
These provisions have made material changes in the common law. The
Court of Appeals in Collins v. Carman, 5 Md. 503, observed that "under
this Act, when a man dies leaving a will making valid gifts of real and
personal estate to his wife, she has not, as she had at common law, a vested
right to dower in his land or to a legal share of his personalty, but her
vested rights are under the will by virtue of the Statute law. The law
clearly gives the husband the power by his will to bar or extinguish the
common law rights of his widow, unless she thinks proper to quit all claim
to the property conferred on her by the will. And to effect the husband's
object the wife need not declare her assent; if. however, she desires to
defeat it, she must manifest her intention to do so by an express dissent.
Such dissent is an act which, by the very terms of the law. must precede
her becoming entitled to or vested with those rights which she might have
claimed but for the will; for the Act declares she shall be barred of those
rights if she does not renounce and quit claim to the devises and bequests.
and make her election to take in lieu thereof her dower or legal share of
the estate. It is this ejection which vests in her the right of dower or legal
share in lieu of what the will had given." And again, "where a will makes
valid gifts to a wife, then, under our Statute, she has no such common law
rights as render her voluntary assent to the will necessary to bar or defeat
them; the law itself creates* the bar unless, being dissatisfied with 307
the will, she actually renounces it, and her positive dissent confers upon
her just such portions of the estate as she could have claimed had her hus-
band died intestate."
In this case the husband had devised to trustees a lot. house and furni-
ture, to be used by his wife during- her life, and also that the trustees
should pay to his wife's niece $50 per month, for the expenses of all the
comforts and necessaries that should be necessary for the family of his
wife. The wife had been insane some time prior to her husband's death,
and so continued until her decease, which occurred more than four years
afterwards, during which time she had enjoyed the benefits of the devises
in her favour. On her death her administrator filed a renunciation of the
devises made for the benefit of his intestate, and afterwards filed a bill to
obtain a decree declaring the renunciation effectual, and for an account of
the husband's personalty and of the rents and profits of the realty.
The Court determined that this devise being for the use of the wife was
clearly within the Act, that the language of the Act included every widow,
whatever were her age or mental condition, and that the right to renounce
was a privilege personal to the widow which her representatives could
not exercise. This latter point had been previously determined in Boone v.
Boone, 3 H. & McH. 95, in construction of the Act of 1729, ch. 24, sec. 10.
The Court declined to intimate any opinion, whether a Court of Equity
could or not make an election for an insane widow during her life and in
proper time. It seems clear from the approval by the Court of the case
of Lewis v. Lewis, 7 Ired. 73, that the committee of an insane widow could
not dissent for her, and for the reason, that there is no proviso or saving
(26)

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 401   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives