clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 395   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

27 H. 8, CAP. 10, USES. 395
for the wife for life, &c., and the husband gave the bond, but paid only a
small portion of the 2000l. and died, after having sold real estate of which
he was seised during the marriage, it was held that the settlement was a
good equitable bar of dower, and that the widow was not entitled to a
lien upon the real estate in respect of the provision which failed. And so
it has been decided that if she accept a term of years. Rose v. Reynolds,
1 Swanst. 446, or an annuity, Vizard v. Longdale, Kelynge's Ch. Cas. 17,
stated in 2 Eden, 66, and in Dyke v. Rendall, n. or if any provision be
made for her before marriage out of "any of the new species of property
which have grown up since, by new improvements, commerce, and from
the funds," per Lord Hardwicke, 2 Eden, 65, she will be barred of her
common law right. And so a trust estate will be a good equitable jointure.
In Maurer v. Mauser's Ex'rs, 5 Md. 324, where by an ante-nuptial settle-
ment it had been agreed between husband and wife, that neither would
claim in any way the real or personal property of the other before or after
the other's death, the Court of Appeals held that the wife having abandoned
all claim to her husband's property had no right to question the propriety
of the probate of his will. And in Maurer v. Naill, 25 Md. 532, the
agreement was enforced as a good contract in bar of dower. And in Edelin
v. Edelin, 11 Md. 415, a widow, who by such an ante-nuptial agreement
had relinquished all her right in her husband's property, was not allowed
the costs and expenses of an unsuccessful attempt to resist the probate
of her husband's will, although administration had been granted to her.
Jointure of female infant.—* It was the opinion of Lord Coke and 303
Lord Hale, that an infant was barred also by a jointure made before mar-
riage, Co. Litt. 36 b, n. 7. The question was finally settled in Drury v. Drury,
reported as the Earl of Buckinghamshire v. Drury, 3 Bro. P. C. 492, and
also 2 Eden, 38; in which case it was determined that a legal jointure was
not a compensation for dower agreed to by the wife, but a provision con-
ferred upon her, and was not founded on any idea of contract; hence it
followed that in case of the wife being an infant when such provision was
made, no objection arose from incapacity to contract. In that case the
infant had executed an ante-nuptial contract in the presence of her guar-
dian, who was a subscribing witness. The husband agreed, that in case his
intended wife should survive him, his heirs, executors or administrators
should pay her during life an annuity of 600l. for her jointure, which
provision she agreed to accept in full satisfaction of her dower and thirds.
And it was held that in equity, by analogy to the legal rule, (and not on the
ground of contract, as we have seen is the ground in cases of adults ac-
cepting equitable jointures,) an infant may be barred by an equitable
jointure settled on her before marriage by the consent and approbation of
her parents or guardian. In Jordan v. Savage, before Lord King, 2 Eq.
Cas. Abr. 102, an ante-nuptial settlement on an infant wife was enforced
as an equitable bar to her customary provision in copyholds by analogy
to the Statute, and the same principle had been asserted in Sice v. Seys,
Barn. ch. 117; Harvey v. Ashley, 3 Atk. 607, and Davila v. Davila, 2 Vern.
724, and see Williams v. Chitty, 3 Ves. Jun., 645. In Maryland, a bill
(1768, ch. 2,) having passed both houses of Assembly enabling Mary Dar-
nall, an infant, to execute a settlement on her marriage with Charles Car-
roll of Carrollton, it was much debated in the Upper house whether such

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 395   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives