clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 370   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

370 21 H. 8, CAP. 5, S. B, ASSETS.
BOW not to be considered legal assets. But in Dent v. Maddox supra, it
was determined that by a rightful sale under the Act, real estate was con-
verted into personalty and represented entirely by the executor, and that
the proceeds of sales were to be accounted for as personalty accordingly,
from which it would seem that they are legal assets. And see Smithers v.
Hooper, 23 Md. 273- As to the rule of distribution, however, there is no
distinction here between legal and equitable assets.
Power of sale by implication.—Where a will authorizes lands to be sold
for the payment of debts, and omits to confer on any one the power to
make sale, but appoints executors, they have by implication power to make
the sale,6 it was determined in Magruder v. Peter, 11 G. & J. 217, that
this implied authority was not taken away by the Act of 1785, ch. 72, see.
4, Code, Art. 16, sec. 66." The Court there explained that their expres-
sions in Magruder v. Peter, 4 G. & J. 323, had been misunderstood by the
Supreme Court in Peter v. Beverly, 10 Pet. 563, that they only said that
a different practice with respect to such cases, as are provided for by the
Act of 1785, ch. 72, had obtained here in consequence of that Act.
6
Such a power in the executor will be implied wherever the proceeds of
the sale are to be disbursed and distributed by him. Poterfield v. Poter-
field, 85 Md. 664; Ogle v. Reynolds, 75 Md. 150. But where the will does
not provide how the sale is to be made and appoints no executor, then the
sale can only be made under decree of a court of equity. Baumeister v.
Silver, 98 Md. 418.
6
Code 1911, Art. 16, sec. 94. Proceedings under this statute to appoint
a trustee in place of an executor or trustee, who dies or fails to act, are
generally ex parte. Kennard v. Bernard, 98 Md. 613; Sloan v. Safe Dep.
Co., 73 Md. 239; Fulton v. Harman, 44 Md. 251; Dorsey v. Thompson, 37
Md. 46; Davis v. Clabaugh, 30 Md. 508. See also note 1 supra.
In connection with the notes on this Statute, see also notes to 4 & 5 W. &
M., c. 24.
CAP. V.
What Fees ought to be taken for Probate of Testaments.
V. Provided always, That if the person so deceased will
by his Testament, or last Will, any Lands, Tenements, or
Hereditaments, to be sold, that the Money thereof coming,
nor the Profits of the said Lands, for any time to be taken,
shall not be accounted as any of the Goods or Chattels of the
said person so deceased.
The Profits of the Lands to be sold shall not be accounted the Testator's
Goods. Dyer, 264, 310. Fitz. Exec. 1, 37, 51.

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 370   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives