clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 352   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

352 11 H- 7, CAP. 20, ALIENATION IN DOWER.
favours bestowed by the law on women, affirmed it to be only reason to
construe the law for the correction of such as would be of covin and
falsity to impair their deceased husband's inheritance. It was considered
that the widow "was within the terms of the Act, but it was further
resolved that if she were not within the words she was within the intent
and meaning. It was held, too, that the heir might enter immediately, that
is in the life of the tenant in tail; but no judgment was given on account
of a defect in the plaintiff's replication in not showing certainly how the
plaintiff's wife was heir to the tail. The Act has since been adjudged
expressly to extend to trusts, for trusts are now what uses were then and
the latter are expressly mentioned, see Clifton v. Jackson, 2 Vern. 486;
Symson v. Turner, 1 Eq. Ca. Abr. 220, where a husband conveyed lands
to trustees in trust for the wife in tail general, remainder to himself in fee.
268 He had no issue and died. The widow suffered a *recovery, and
devised the lands for payment of her debts and died without issue, and
the husband's heir was held entitled against the widow's creditors.
So in Sir George Brown's case, 3 Rep. 50 b. Lynch v. Spencer, Cro. Eliz.
513, it was said that the intent of the Statute was to prohibit not only every
bar to the heir, but every manner of discontinuance which puts the heir to
his real action. In that case, a woman tenant in tail of the gift of her
husband made a lease for three lives, not warranted by Stat. 32 H. 8, c.
28, but without any clause of warranty in the lease. It was held within
the Act, for the words of the Act "with warranty" refer to releases and
confirmations, which do not work a discontinuance without warranty. It
was said to be within the Act, too, if the gift by the husband or his
ancestors, by which the wife takes, was made as well in consideration of
money paid by the wife or her father, as of the marriage, Kirkman v.
Thompson,- Cro. Jac. 474, and see Villers v. Beaumont, Dyer, 146 a. A
case is put in Palm. 217, where the husband and wife sell the wife's estate
and buy other lands with the money, which are settled on both. Such a
jointure is said to be within the Act, for the husband might have done
•what he pleased with the money. However it seems clear that neither of
these cases would be law at this day in Maryland.
The case of Eyston v. Studd, Plowd. 459, was directly the contrary of
Wimbishe v. Tailbois; for there it was adjudged, that the case though
within the letter was out of the intent of the Act. In that case husband and
wife levied a fine of lands of the wife's inheritance, taking back an estate
tail, "with remainder to the right heirs of the wife, and the question was,
whether the wife might after her husband's death alien those lands without
danger of the Statute, and it was determined that she might. For the
object of the Statute was to restrain women, having jointures which came
originally from their husbands or their husband's ancestors, from doing
anything to the prejudice of the heirs. But in this ease it was said, there
came no jointure from the husband, but the wife had made a jointure to her
husband, and to restrain her after his decease from doing what she pleased
with her own inheritance was contrary to all reason, Co. Litt. 366 a.
So where the lands move from the wife's ancestor the Act does not
apply. In the case of Copland v. Pyatt, Cro. Car. 244, the wife's father
in consideration of 400 l paid by the husband's father, and of the marriage,
and for the preferment of his own blood, covenanted to stand seised to the

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 352   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  Cannot perform flastmod(): Win32 Error Code = 2

Maryland State Archives