clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 35   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

20 H. 3, CAP. 1, DAMAGES IN DOWER. 35
decree for one-third of such balance. The same principle would apply in
other cases.
Interest.—In England it seems from Lindsay v. Gibbon, cited 3 Bro. C. C.
495, and Wakefield v. Childs, 1 Fonb. Eq. 23, 2 Daniel Ch. Prac. 1143, that
interest will not be allowed on arrears of dower. In Goodburn v. Stevens,
1 Md. Ch. Dec. 420, Chancellor Johnson observed, that he did not find it
anywhere decided that a widow can recover interest on arrears of dower,
and he refers to what was said by Lord Loughborough in Lindsay v. Gib-
bon; but he expressly declined to express any opinion on the question where
the right to the arrears was clear. In Maryland, however, arrears of rents
and profits when decreed by a Court of equity generally bear interest, see
Davis v. Walsh, 2 H. & J. 329; and we have seen that, at law, the jury in
assessing damages prodetentione dotis in effect give the widow more than
one-third of past rents and profits, where she has suffered damages to a
larger amount on account of the non-assignment of her dower. In Darnall
v. Hill, the Court of Appeals thought that, under the circumstances of that
case, the widow was not entitled to be allowed interest. The inference is
that in ordinary cases she would be entitled to interest, and see H. K.
Chase's case, 1 Bl. 206; 1 Roper H. & W. 457.
* The account may be brought down according to the practice of the 98
Court to the date of the decree, or to the date of the decree of the Appellate
Court, if an appeal be taken, or to the delivery of possession of the dower
assigned to the widow, Darnall v- Hill, supra. Mr. Alexander in his Chan-
cery Practice, 173, recommends that the account, where the bill is also for
assignment of dower, should be delayed until after the delivery of posses-
sion, so that the widow may recover for arrearages up to that time, whereas
by the other practice the arrears between the taking of the account and
delivery of possession must be abandoned or made the subject of a second
suit.
Costs in equity.—With regard to costs, the rule formerly was that as the
widow came into equity to recover dower for her own convenience, she would
not be allowed costs except in cases where the heir made a vexatious resist-
ance to her claim, Curtis v. Curtis, 2 Bro. C. C. 620; Worgan v. Ryder,
1 Ves. & Bea. 20; Bamford v. Bamford, 5 Hare, 203.
We have seen that in an application by the widow for dower in a pro-
ceeding by creditors to sell the real estate of the husband, the costs of the
assignment were paid out of the general fund, Watkins v. Worthington,
2 Bl. 512. The practice is in other cases the same—to allow the widow costs
in every instance—for it is the duty of the heir to assign dower. 5
6
It is said in Grove v. Todd, 45 Md. 252, that the question of costs, like
that of interest, depends entirely on the character of the complainant's
claim and the nature of the defence and that it is clearly competent for
the court below to allow or disallow them. The proceeding was in equity
against alienees for an assignment of dower and the demandant was
charged with one-third of the costs of the assignment.
Improvement* on land—Damage* for detention.—Price v. Hobbs, 47 Md.
359, is now the ruling case in this State as to assignment of dower with
regard to improvements on the land and as to the demandant's right to
damages for detention of her dower. The court in an opinion by Judge

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 35   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives