clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 33   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

20 H. 3, CAP. 1, DAMAGES IN DOWER. 33
Perk. sec. 329. And the rule is the same as to any deterioration of the
property arising from natural causes, 4 Kent's Comm. 67.
Upon the commission being returned the Court confirms it or rejects it as
in other cases. The final decree provides that the widow shall hold in sev-
erally for life the part assigned by the Commissioners to her for her dower.
Mesne profits.—* In Sellman v. Bowen, 8 G. & J. 50, the Court of 26
Appeals observed, that the recipient of the rents and' profits of the hus-
band's land is in equity considered a trustee or bailiff, and is therefore
liable for an account of his stewardship. The inference might be drawn
from this that the jurisdiction of equity to decree mesne profits to the widow
is independent of the Statute of Merton, and such is the view of Mr. Roper,
H. & W. 453, 454. He goes on to say that an account of mesne profits may
be enforced against the alienee or heir, without regard to any previous
demand made by the widow, or to the circumstance whether or not the
husband died seised. In Sellman v. Bowen, however, the Court determined
that the account could only be taken from the time of demand, see Stewart
v. Carr, 6 Gill, 430. and expressly admitted the analogy of the Statute of
Merton on another point.
If the widow die without having demanded her dower, the right to mesne
profits does not survive to her representatives, and so it was held in Steiger
v. Hillen, 5 G. & J. 121, and in Kiddall v. Trimble, 8 Gill, 207, although Ch.
Bland seems in the first case to have thought otherwise. From these cases
it appears that the claim of the widow for •mesne profits can not be sup-
ported, if she had not already recovered her dower at law, or does not sue
for it also in equity. If she consents to take dower without receiving her
proportion of rents and profits she can never afterwards recover them,
although if she dies pending a suit for dower, equity will allow rents and
profits to her representatives. But this case is subject to the exception that
if the legal estate out of which the profits are to spring is gone, the claim
to such profits falls with it, unless some equitable circumstances exist which
prevented her from preferring her claim, such as fraud, misrepresentation,
or concealment, or some legal impediment whereby a demand of dower on
her part would have been rendered fruitless. Yet in Lawes v. Lumpkin, 18
Md- 334, it was held that an heir might, on a bill for partition against the
other heirs and the widow, obtain a decree that she account with him for
his proportion of the rents and profits received by her; an authority some-
what inconsistent with the notion that a formal assignment is necessary
before the widow's right to mesne profits accrues. And Perking, sec. 451,
says, "But if all the lands which the husband had were holden in socage,
and his wife hath them as guardian in socage, she shall be allowed one-
third part of the profits upon her account in allowance of her dower in the
meantime, but in such case she shall not endow herself of the third part of
the lands or tenements to hold in freehold;" and see Hilleary v. Hilleary's
lessee, 26 Md. 274, that the widow, where her title of entry has not accrued
by assignment of her part in certainty, cannot defend an ejectment upon
her possession. And in the next section he says that it is no answer for the
heir to a writ of dower to say that the widow might endow herself. Hamil-
ton v. Mohun, 1 P. Wins. 118, and Graham v. Graham, 1 Ves. Sen. 262, are
to the same effect. On the other hand if the defendant dies the widow will
be allowed in equity to prosecute her claim against his representatives,
(3)

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 33   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives