| Volume 194, Page 324 View pdf image (33K) |
|
321 11 H. 6, CAP. 6, CONTINUANCE OF SUITS. the Act. 2°. That a remainder-man is within the Act, though the pre- amble and body of the Act speak only of the reversioner. And 3°, the defendant having pleaded an assignment to A., before which no waste done, and the plaintiff having replied the Statute, and that the grant to A. was to the intent, that he might not know against whom to bring his action of waste, and averred a taking of the profits, and the defendant having in his rejoinder traversed the intent, it was resolved that the intent aforesaid was not traversable, but the pernency of the profits, for in that the intent was implied. It is said in F. N, B. 56 A., that if tenant for life or years does waste and grants over his estate, the writ lies against him who did the waste and not against the grantee; but if waste be done after the aliena- tion, it lies against the tenant, F. N. B. 60 L., with a quaere. 245 CAP. VI. No suit pending before any Justices, shall be discontinued by a new Commission.
|
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 194, Page 324 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.