| Volume 194, Page 279 View pdf image (33K) |
|
4 H. 4, CAP. 18, ATTORNEYS. 279 * The word "demurrant" in the original is said to be not well trans- 208 lated by the word "dwelling," Lit. Rep. 328. It is held that the sheriff has no jurisdiction except in his own county; as observed by Lord Ellen- borough in Chase v. Joyce, 4 M. & S. 412, with respect to a bailable latitat, there has never been a doubt but that it must be executed in the county, and by the officer of the sheriff to whom it was directed; out of the county the officer would be a trespasser. And, though in case of process not bail- able, the same may be served without the intervention of the sheriff, yet it may be delivered to the sheriff, and he may be required to execute it, but it can never be contended that he could be called on to serve it out of his county, or that he could justify entering the house, or coming on the land of the party out of his county, for the purpose of serving it. But the Court will not enter into a question of the regularity of process upon the question of the limits of adjoining counties, ibid., and Hammond v. Taylor, 3 B. & A. 408; and the practice in such cases is to require an affidavit that the arrest did not take place on the borders of the county, and that there is no dispute as to boundaries, Webber v. Manning, 1 Dowl. P. C. 24. The sheriff may, however, do a ministerial act out of his county, as make a panel or return a writ, Bac. Abr. Sheriff, F. The relations of the sheriffs to the Court of Chancery were considered by Chancellor Bland in Deale v. Estep, 3 Bl. 433. See also the Code, Art. SHERIFF.! 1 Code 1911, Art. 87. A deputy sheriff in Maryland is a common law officer and is not required to take any oath as a qualification to act as such. His appointment by the sheriff in writing is sufficient. He possesses authority such as the sheriff himself may exercise, as to abate a public nuisance in a public highway. Turner v. Holtzman, 54 Md. 148; or to arrest without warrant, Edgar v. Burke, 96 Md. 715; or to conduct an inquisition in lunacy. Ex parte Bristor, 115 Md. —. CAP. XVIII. The Punishment of an Attorney found in default.
|
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 194, Page 279 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.