| Volume 194, Page 276 View pdf image (33K) |
|
276 2 H. 4, CAP. 7, NONSUIT. STATUTES Made at WESTMINSTER, Anno 2 HEN. IV. and A. D. 1400. CAP. VII. In what case the Plaintiff shall not be nonsuit if the Verdict pass against him.
206 *Br Nonsuit, 6. Fitz. Nonsuit, 6, 12, 13, 15. 1 Inst. 139 b. At the common law upon every continuance or day given over before judgment, the plaintiff might have been nonsuited; and consequently, be- fore this Statute, after verdict given, if the Court gave a day to be advised, the plaintiff was then demandable and might therefore have been nonsuited, Co. Litt. 139 b. See the subject excellently explained in 1 Wms. Saund. 195 d. n. i. to Mounson v. Redshaw. It may be observed that motions to nonsuit the plaintiff do not prevail in our practice, Graham v. Harris, 5 G. & J. 497; Kettlewell v. Peters, 23 Md. 312.1 1A. non suit must be the voluntary act of the plaintiff. Kettlewell v. Peters, supra. His right to suffer a non suit is a valuable one, for the pro- tection of which the plaintiff must be called before the verdict is delivered. Hall v. Schuchardt, 34 Md. 15; First Bank v. National Bank, 39 Md. 600; 92 U. S. 122; Ferrall v. Farnen, 67 Md. 83; Andrews v. Central Bank, 77 Md. 29. Cf. Bolton Co. v. Stokes, 82 Md. 50. As to judgment of won pros. where plaintiff is in default in filing some pleading when under rule to do so, see Marsh v. Johns, 49 Md. 569; Rut- |
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 194, Page 276 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.