clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 20   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

20 9 H. 3, CAP. 18, STATE'S PREFERENCE.
kin, 1 Bl. 503; Ridgely v. Iglehart, 3 Bl. 540; Jones v. Jones, 1 Bl. 443;
Green's Estate, 4 Md. Ch. Dec. 356.-'
In the ease of the State v. The Bank of Md. 6 G. & J. 205, this question
of the State's priority was much discussed by the Court. The Legislature
had directed a deposit of State funds to be made with the Bank, which
was accordingly done. The Bank afterwards becoming embarrassed made
an assignment to trustees of all its property, real and personal, for the
benefit of all its creditors equally and rateably. The State insisted that un-
der the deed it was entitled to be paid its whole debt in preference to and
to the exclusion of the other creditors. The Court said that "it was too
late to deny the right of the State to have its debt first paid out of the prop-
erty of the debtor remaining in his hands and no lien standing in the way.
It does not indeed exist here with all the incidents to the royal prerogative
right in England. We have not the writ of protection, nor the extent in
chief, or in aid. The priority of the State is a rule only in the distribu-
tion of the property of the debtor &c." They determined that the assign-
ment, being made for the equal benefit of all the creditors of the Bank,
was a fair and bona fide assignment for a valuable consideration and
passed the property of the Bank beyond its control, and that such an as-
signment here (as in England) had the effect of protecting the property
in the hands of the trustees against the common law priority of the State,
and accordingly that the preference which the State had while the title
to the property remained in the Bank was defeated by the deed of trust.
When the debtor has property in lands and tenements the State is pro-
tected by the 6th Section of the Act of 1778, ch. 9, Code Art. 81 sec. 148,5
from the time of the institution of its suit, and gains a preference over all
other creditors who have not previously thereto secured a lien on the
debtor's lands by judgment, mortgage or otherwise. And this section in-
cludes every debtor to the State without distinction and without regard to
the manner in which he became indebted, Davidson v. Clayland, supra. The
•The doctrine is again affirmed in Orem v. Wrightson, 51 Md. 34, where
it is held that the State has a right to be first paid, as a preferred creditor,
out of assets in the hands of the administrator of its deceased debtor,
except only where some antecedent lien stands in the way, the court adding
that it is unnecessary to inquire how this right arose, whether it is a pre-
rogative right derived from the common law, or whether it has been con-
ferred by statute. The case further decides that where the sureties of a
deceased debtor have paid his debt to the State, they are equitably entitled
to be subrogated to the priority of the State in the distribution of the as-
sets of the deceased debtor as to the debt so paid.
But the State's right to priority is limited to cases where the property of
its debtor remains in his hands. Therefore in State v. Williams, 101 Md.
529, it is held that the claim of the State against an insolvent insurance
company for loss on the State's property, or for unearned premiums, is
not entitled to priority of payment from the receivers of the company
as against the claims of other creditors, when no proceedings were taken
by the State to enforce its claim before the appointment of receivers. See
note to State v. Rogers, 2 H. & McH. 198, Brantly's Ed.
'•Code 1911, Art. 81, sec. 145.

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 20   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives