| Volume 194, Page 165 View pdf image (33K) |
|
13 E. 1, STAT. 1, CAP. 81, BILLS OF EXCEPTION. 165
A Writ of Nusance. Rast. 405. 2 Inst. 404. Past. 441. 6 R. 2, c. 3. 9 Co. 55. Quod permitfat. Rast. 538. Regist. 32. Rast. 419. Coke pla. 399. 14 Ed. 3, 17. Rast. 123. Fitz. Entry, 3, 7, 8, 10, 61, 64, 67, 68, 69, 74. Co. Litt. 54 b. It was observed by Serjeant Copley in arguing Romilly v. James, 6 Taunt. 263, that the only instance of this Statute having been acted on is that of the writ in consimili casu, for remedy in the case of alienation in fee by tenant for life or by the curtesy, which is framed as closely as pos- sible on the model of the writ in casu proviso, which extended only to alienation by tenant in dower. However, a great variety of new precedents of writs, in cases before unprovided for, are given by the Statute of West- minster 2, itself. The first parts of the Statute are not in force. CAP. XXXI. An Exception to a Plea shall be sealed by the Justices.
|
|||||
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
| Volume 194, Page 165 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.