clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 115   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

6 E. 1, CAP. 7, ALIENATION OF DOWER. 115
What is waste.5—In actions of this kind, and this distinguishes them
from the old action of waste, it is a question for the jury whether waste
has or has not been committed, see Doe v. Bond, 5 B. & C. 856, and no act is
considered waste which is not injurious to the inheritance, either by dimin-
ishing the value of the estate, or by increasing the burthen upon it, or by
impairing the evidence of title, (as to which see Young v. Spencer, 10 B. &
C. 145,) and the amount and fact of damage in all these respects are for the
jury. If it be small, the consequences of waste do not attach, Doe v. Earl
Burlington, 5 B. & Ad. 507; Huntley v. Russell, 13 Q. B. 588.
permitted the buildings on the land to fall into a state of dilapidation." In re
Cartwright is followed in the case of In re Parry, (1900) 1 Ch. 160, which
applies the same doctrine in favor of a tenant for life of leaseholds, even
though the lease contains covenants by the lessee to keep the premises in
good repair and to deliver them up in good repair at the end of the term.
No distinction seems to be drawn in any one of the above cases between
tenants for life and tenants for years and none is apparent in principle.
In Maryland it would seem that under the case of White v. Wagner, supra,
an action for permissive waste would lie against a tenant either for life or
years, but note the dictum of McSherry, C. J., in Gluck v. Baltimore, 81 Md.
315, 326: "Now, the common law has always thrown the burden of repairs
upon the tenant, though it imposes no obligation on him to make them unless
he covenants to do so;" citing Taylor on Landlord & Tenant, sec. 327,
which does not support the latter part of the statement. The dictum is
repeated in Kirby v. Wylie, 108 Md. 501, 512.
5
See note on this subject to 52 H. 3 c. 23 s. 2.
CAP. VII. 86
A Writ of Entry in casu proviso, upon a Woman's Alienation of Dower.
Also if a Woman sell or Ensement si feine vende, ou
give in Fee, or for Term of done en fee, OH a terme de vie
Life, the Land that she hold- tenement que el tient en doiv-
eth in Dower; it is ordained, er: Establie est, que Ie heire,
that the Heir, or other to ou auter, a que la terre deve-
whom the Land ought to re- roit reverter apres Ie decease
vert after the Death of such la feme, eit main tenant son
Woman, shall have present recoverie per briefe den tre, fait
Recovery to demand the Land de ceo en la chauu eerie.
by a Writ of Entry made
thereof in the Chancery.

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Alexander's British statutes in force in Maryland. 2d ed., 1912
Volume 194, Page 115   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives