clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Somerset County Judicial Records, 1690-1691
Volume 191, Page 66   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

March 10th: 1690/1 ( 66 )

Richard: Tull. brings his Servant boy viz Philip Bready before the Justices in Court
Sitting, complaining that his sd Servant without any occasion given, had Run away from
his Servitude eight dayes, the sd Bready being by their worps examined did Confess
to the same. whereupon the Court Ordered that the sd Bready should made satisfaction
to his sd Master according to Law in Such cases made & provided &c.


To their Maties Justices of y Peace for Somerset County
The humble Petion of Robert Stett.
Sheweth that whereas your Petioner by your worps Order in June Court Last past was Sett free
from John: Starrett, and hath been at liberty by the sd Order till the 19th. day of ffebruary
last past, was taken by vertue of a Hue and Cry from under the hands and Seals of mr Thomas
Newbold and mr Samuel: Hopkins, and carryed away by Anthony Bell Constable to the sd John

Starrett, Contrary to your worps Order so your petioner humbly prayes your worps would be
pleased
to lett your Petioner know whether he is a freeman or not. And your Petioner as in duty shall ever
pray

The above sd Petion being Read and Considered, this Court has Confermed the verdict
of
the Jury as appears upon Record. Vide Verd. Lib. B:W. fo: 114. - - - - - - - - - -
Whereupon mr. James: Sangster in Open Court Ordered that these two following papers should
be recorded. he being Attorney for Jno. Starret Contr. Stett. - - - - - - - - - - - -

Somerset County Ss. Stitt plt Reasons why judgmt ought not to be entered agt y deft.
Startrett deft.
Whereas the plt by his Petion to their Maties Justices of this County last Court did show that ye
said Stitt plt did complain that he the sd Stitt had Served the sd Starret his Master. the full term
&
time of five years and then and there did demand his freedome according to Custome.the sd Starret by
his
Attorney James: Sangster comes and sayes that the sd Stett from the deft is not free, 1st because the said
Stett was put an aprentice with his owne consent by the sd.Stitts ffather 2dly till he should be of the years of one
and twenty to the sd Starrett then in the Kingdome of Ireland, and there did Serve some part of his said time
before
he was to this Province transported. Quere whether an agreement made in their Maties European: King dominion
may not be good in his plantations in America, if good then the deft hath a double right to the plt, first by the
Parents Guift, and then secondly by the Servants full consent as will more plainly appear (if not good) 3dly
then the said Stitt at the expiration of his transported time was free according to the Customs of the Country, to
transact and bind him Self without his Parents consent, and if he was free to act he may as well nay more freely
act with his Master then any other per man espetialy being a tradesman and where the sd Stitt had had his
upbringing
4thly. And whereas the sd Stitt upon hearing of his sd petion, did alleadge that the sd Starrett his Master,did force
and
Compell the sd Stitt to set his hand to an Indenture, which was the Issue joynd between y plt & deft, which
Indenture was here in Court produced, and under the hand and Seal of him the sd Stitt acknowledged to be his Act and deed
before
mr Edmund: Howard one of their Maties.Justices of the Peace for this County and by him attested in Open Court upon Oath
to be the voluntary act and deed of the sd Stitt, without any threat, force or compulsion, now the law sayes
volentia
fit injuria: also Quere whether the bare & false allegation without proof or shadow of Circumstance be more
effective
Law, then the positive Evidence of a worll Magistrate in the face of Court & Jury, and fifthly the sd Stitt was free
from
the 23d. of January until the 24th. of ffebry, before he did bind himselfe anew, and if had not been free by the
Masters







 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Somerset County Judicial Records, 1690-1691
Volume 191, Page 66   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives