|
262 JOURNAL OF PROCEEDINGS [Feb. 4.
|
|
AFFIRMATIVE.
|
|
|
Messrs.
|
Lankford,
|
White,
|
|
Loker,
|
Harrington,
|
Harris,
|
|
Baldwin, of A. A.,
|
Marbury,
|
Baldwin, of Har.,
|
|
Wells,
|
Wootton,
|
Hopkins,
|
|
Duke,
|
Thomas, of Q. A.,
|
Hardcastle, of Car
|
|
Mitckell,
|
Brown,
|
Garey,
|
|
Chapman ,
|
Dennis,
|
McLane,
|
|
Turner,
|
Pur n ell,
|
Sword,
|
|
Brattan,
|
Bowl us,
|
Merrick — 26.
|
|
|
NEGATIVE.
|
|
|
Messrs.
|
McCreery,
|
Marshall,
|
|
Latrobe, Speaker,
|
Ritter,
|
Hoblitzell,
|
|
Martin ,
|
Streett,
|
Neill,
|
|
Beck,
|
Banner,
|
Welty,
|
|
Wilmer,
|
Hamilton ,
|
Seibert,
|
|
Kilbourn,
|
Cooper,
|
Kean,
|
|
Owings,
|
Morse,
|
Wilson, of Alle.,
|
|
Cameron ,
|
Blake,
|
Standish ,
|
|
Shipley,
|
Wiley,
|
Myers,
|
|
Hardcastle, of Tal.
|
, Colton,
|
Percy,
|
|
Touchstone,
|
Kirk,
|
Shower,
|
|
Owens,
|
Collins,
|
Winters,
|
|
Richards,
|
Ehlen,
|
Crouse,
|
|
Biddle,
|
Gardner,
|
German,
|
|
Duvall,
|
Markland,
|
Gordy — 45.
|
|
Thomas, of Fred.,
|
|
|
So the motion to lay the order on the table was not con-
curred in.
The question then recurring on the adoption of the order,
On motion of Mr. Hopkins,
The yeas and nays were ordered and appeared, as follows:
|
|
AFFIRMATIVE.
|
|
|
Messrs.
|
Thomas, of Fred.,
|
Hoblitzell,
|
|
Latrobe, Speaker,
|
McCreery,
|
Neill,
|
|
Martin ,
|
Ritter,
|
Welty,
|
|
Beck,
|
Hamilton,
|
Seibert,
|
|
Wilmer,
|
Cooper,
|
Kean,
|
|
Kilbourn,
|
Morse,
|
Wilson, of Alle.
|
|
Owings,
|
Wiley,
|
Standish,
|
|
Cameron,
|
Col ton ,
|
Myers,
|
|
Hardcastle, of Tal.
|
, Kirk,
|
Percy,
|
|
Touchstone,
|
Collins,
|
Winters,
|
|
Owens,
|
Ehlen,
|
Crouse,
|
|
 |