clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Maryland Manual, 1996-97
Volume 187, Page 260   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

260 / Department of the Environment Maryland Manual 1996-1997

Germs, not putrid air, however, were proved to cause disease and, in 1893, oysters were named carriers of
the disease in a typhoid outbreak in Connecticut. Thus, when the Baltimore Sewerage Commission in 1897
proposed a giant sewer dumping city wastes into Chesapeake Bay, the powerful oyster interests opposed and
effectively blocked action. Baltimore was not the only culprit; smaller cities and towns always had dumped
untreated sewage into Bay waters. Nonetheless, Baltimore's rapidly growing population made the problem more
acute. Yet, in 1904, the oyster interests again prevailed in the General Assembly, and legislation prohibited the
new sewerage commission from building any system "involving the discharge of sewage ... into the Chesapeake
Bay or any of its tributaries" (Chapter 349, Acts of 1904). Interpreting this restriction to mean untreated sewage,
Baltimore resolved to have municipal sewage treatment. The City, formerly the only major city without sewage
treatment, gained the most advanced, state-of-the-art system when its Back Bay plant opened in 1912.

Meanwhile, factors other than untreated sewage were recognized as polluting Chesapeake Bay. In
1910, the federal Public Health Service investigated pollution in both the Bay and the Potomac River.
Truck farming and canneries had proliferated around the Bay, and the Public Health Service report agreed
with the findings of the State Fisheries Commissioners that canning wastes harmed fisheries.

In that same year, the State Board of Health was reformed as the Department of Health, within which
the Bureau of Sanitary Engineering was established (Chapter 560, Acts of 1910). The Bureau protected
water purity, oversaw sewerage and water supply projects, and in time became concerned with industrial
waste and air pollution. In 1914, the Department of Health was made responsible for "preserving the
purity of the waters of the State" (Chapter 810, Acts of 1914). The Department's Bureau of Sanitary
Engineering regulated public water supplies and sewerage systems and issued cease-and-desist orders to
manufacturing or industrial establishments found polluting State waters with their wastes, if a threat to
human health or a public nuisance. In 1918, two employees of the Department of Health developed a
formula to chlorinate water thus ensuring a pure drinking water supply not only for Maryland, but
ultimately worldwide. One of them — Abel Wolman —went on as sanitary engineer, and later consultant
to more than fifty nations and helped bring safe drinking water to millions of people around the world.

Because concerns about water quality originated with fishery and oyster interests, in 1917 the
Conservation Commission began to enforce abatement procedures for discharges which threatened fish
and shellfish, or their "propagation, cultivation or conservation thereof, or to their safety as human food
..." (Chapter 14, Acts of 1917). Discharges from public sewage disposal plants were exempted, however,
and the Commission prohibited from infringing upon the jurisdiction of the Department of Health.

The Conservation Commission sought cooperation from Maryland factory owners in treating their wastes
to prevent industrial pollution. The Commission's 1917 annual report stated that no one would "wilfully
persist in such an abuse" once they realized how untreated industrial wastes killed marine life. Lacking staff
and facilities for scientific research or chemical analysis, the Commission's work to control pollution never
received the same attention as did the condition of the oyster spat or the enforcement of game laws. Nonetheless,
the Commission with the Department of Health began by examining pollution in the Curtis Bay area of
Baltimore harbor. There, war-related industries had concentrated since 1914. Trade wastes exuded up to four
million gallons per day from just one alcohol plant, whose attorneys in 1922 suggested that safeguarding Curtis
Bay waters was impractical and impossible. They recommended that the area be designated an industrial zone
exempt from water quality requirements. Despite the area's highly colored, thick and odoriferous waters, the
Conservation Commission was unwilling to pinpoint Curtis Bay pollution as the cause of oyster decline in the
Patapsco River and upper Chesapeake, blaming increased salinity and excess rainfall instead.

In the early 1920s, industrial pollution was overshadowed by oil pollution, a problem exceeding the
enforcement capabilities of the Conservation Commission. Oil-burning ships pumped oil from their bilges
in quiet waters of Chesapeake Bay and its harbors, devastating beaches, waterfowl, and oysters. Conditions
were alleviated somewhat in 1924 when the federal Oil Pollution Act prohibited vessels from dumping
oil in navigable waters. That act was only the second major federal law on water pollution; the first—the
federal Rivers and Harbors Act—outlawed dumping debris in navigable waters in 1899.

The oyster faced a serious crisis in 1924. After a typhoid outbreak, eating raw oysters was outlawed in
Illinois, and the U.S. Public Health Service began an investigation. In Maryland, oyster packing houses
closed and soup kitchens opened on the Eastern Shore to feed the newly unemployed, even though
Maryland's governor stated unequivocally that Maryland oysters never had caused a single case of typhoid.
The Commission, reformed as the Conservation Department in 1922, strove to give the oyster a clean
bill of health. This required regulation of oyster packing rather than water quality.

To control water pollution, the State Department of Health and the Conservation Department continued
their cooperative work. The 1927 annual report of the Conservation Department optimistically claimed:



 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Maryland Manual, 1996-97
Volume 187, Page 260   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives