clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Dalton's The Country Justice, 1690
Volume 153, Page 415   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
Chap. 166.
Examination.

de familia qui tuno intersuerint, pœnam capitalem subibunt, nisi forte per patriam
fuerint liberati.
 

415.
Stamf. 97.
& 179.
Co. L. 6.
    Sunt etiam quædam presumptiones ita violentæ, ut probationem non admittunt
in contrarium; ut si quis cum cultello cruentato capius si super mortuum,
vel fugiendo a murtuo, vel mortem confitetur:  quibus non admittitur
mortem dedicere, nec alia opus est probatione.
    Sir Ed. Coke, 1. 6. maketh three sorts of Presumption:  viz.     §. 3.
Presumption.
    1.  Violenta, (as in this last former case) which he saith is plena
probatio.
 
    2.  Probabilis, which (saith he) moveth little.
 
    3.  Præsumptio levis, seu temeraria, which moveth not at all.
 

 

* Co. 11.
302. vide.

    And yet in cases of felony, &c. the Confession of the Offender,
upon his Examination before the Justice of Peace, shall be no Conviction
of the Offender, except he shall after * confess the same again
upon his Trial or Arraignment, or be found guilty by Verdict of twelve
Men, &c.
    To the like purpose also is the Rule of the Civil Law, Si quis in Judicio
sponte de seipso confiteatur, & postea maneat in Confessione, satis est:  If any
Man in Judgment do confess of himself, of his own accord, and doth persevere
in his Confession, it is enough, and such Confession shall be taken for
an Evidence of the Crime.
Confession.
    But yet at Lent Assizes at Cambridge, Anno quarto Caroli Regis, before
Sir Francis Harvey, upon the Arraignment of a Prisoner for felony, his Examination,
which was taken before the Justice of Peace, wherein he had
confessed the felony, was only given in Evidence, no other Evidence then
coming in upon his Trial; and the Prisoner upon that his own Confession
before the Justice of Peace was found guilty by the Jury of Life and Death,
and had Judgment, &c.
    Also in cases of secret Murthers, and in cases of Poysoning, Witchcraft,
and the like secret Offences, where open and evident Proofs are seldom to
be had, there (it seemeth) half proofs or probable presumptions are to be
allowed, and are good causes of suspition, ' and are sufficient for the Justice
' of Peace to commit the party so suspected.
8 E. 4. 4.
5 H. 7. 4.
Br. F. Imp.
4. 10.

 
 
 
 

17 E. 4. 5.
22 H. 7. 29.

    But note, (by the Common Law) That in an Action of False Imprisonment
brought against the Constable (or other Person that shall
arrest another upon suspition of felony) it is no Plea for them to say, that
the Plaintiff was suspected of felony:  But they must alledge, That there
was such a felony committed, and that the Plaintiff was suspected for the 
same:  for suspition only, without a felony committed, is no cause to
arrest another.  Yet see the Statute of 5 E. 3. cap. 14. ' that if any Man
' have any evil suspition of any Person for felony, &c. be it by day or
' night, they shall be incontinently arrested by the Constables of the
' Towns, &c. and kept in Prison till they be delivered by the Justices, &c.
' Hic. cap. 129.
    Also the Defendant must alledge some special matter (in Fact) to prove
that he, who was arrested, was suspected of felony, (as to say, that the party
arrested is a Man of an evil Fame, or a vagrant Person, &c.) otherwise one


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Dalton's The Country Justice, 1690
Volume 153, Page 415   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives