It is under this statute that the addition of the estate, &c. is inserted in writs and indictments.  In
the case of the state against Hughes, for an assault, the addition was omitted, (with a design, as I have
heard, to try the question;) a plea was put in as follows:  " Because he saith that by form of the
statute in such case made and provided, the addition of the estate, degree, or mystery of him the
said C. ought to be contained in the said indictment, and this he is ready to verify; wherefore, for
that such addition is not contained in the indictment of him the said C.  The said C. prays judgment
of the said indictment, and that the same be quashed," which was accordingly done.  A reference
was made by one the judges to several acts of assembly, in which the process of outlawry
was mentioned.
 

    The writ of corpus cum causa mentioned in this statute, is the habeas corpus ad faciendum et recipiendum.
This statute is mentioned in 3 Bac. Abt., title Habeas Corpus A, and 4 Com. Dig. p. 330;
as a general provision, it appears to have been applicable to the province, and it may be proper to be
incorporated, &c.  As to writs of certiorari, or to writs of habeas corpus, see the note on 21 James
1, Ch. 23.

    See the note on 13 Hen. 4, Ch. 7.
 

    As to the extention of the several statutes of amendment and jeoffaille, see the note on 14 Edw. 3,
Ch. 6.  As to this statute, which referred to that, and explained the doubts whether amendments
might be made as well after judgment as before, see 8 Co. 157.  See also 4 Hen. 6, Ch. 3, confirming
this statute.
 

    See the note on 9 Hen. 5, Ch. 4, which this statute confirmed, together with 14 Edw. 3, Stat. 1,
Ch. 6.