clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Kilty's English Statutes, 1811
Volume 143, Page 10   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
10                                                                STATUTES NOT FOUND APPLICABLE.
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

    CHAP. 13.  Assises of darrein presentment.




    CHAP. 14.  How men of all sorts shall be amerced,
and by whom.

remedy had been generally adopted in the province,
which was not the case.
    There was in 1667, a case of a writ of novel disseisin,
the proceedings in which were not very
regular, since which the action appears to have
fallen into disuse.  I have found no case of an assise
of mort d'ancestor.  See the note under 13
Edw. 1, Ch. 18, stating the opinion of the general
court, that writs of novel disseisin had not been
brought by tenants by ELEGIT.
    CHAP. 13.  See 3 Bl. Com. 245, and 246, as to
the disuse of this action in England.
    It is to be observed also, that the presentments
of clerks or ministers in the province to churches,
were made by the governor.
    CHAP. 14.  It does not appear very clearly what
kind of amercements this chapter related to.
    In the statutes at large, reference is made in the
margin to 34 Edw. 3, Ch. 1, ordaining that fines
shall be reasonable, and to the bill of rights, 1 W.
and M. Sess. 2, Ch. 2, declaring excessive fines and
cruel punishments to be illegal.  According to
lord Coke, (2, Inst. 27,) this act extended to amercements
and not to fines imposed by any court of 
justice.  The latter being imposed  and assessed by
the courts themselves, and the former affeered or
assessed by the county, as appears also in his reports,
(8th, part 38,) and the amercements here
spoken of, were those against the plaintiff being
non suit, or the defendant against whom there was
judgement, under which the party was in misericordia
generally, and the sums not being taxed in
court, they were estreated and delivered to the
coroners to affeere or assess.
    It is stated in 3, Bl. Com. 376, that to be amerced
or a mercie, is to be at the kings mercy with
regard to the fine to be imposed " in misericordia
domini regis pro falso clamore suo,"
but that
though the form still continued, the amercement
was disused, and in page 398 it is stated, that the
defendant might, on judgment, be either amerced
for his delay of justice, or be taken up, capiatur,
to pay a fine to the king in case of any forcible
injury, but that by 5 and 6 W. and M. Ch. 12,
no capias was to issue for this fine, but the plaintiff


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Kilty's English Statutes, 1811
Volume 143, Page 10   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives