clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Constitutional Revision Study Documents of the Constitutional Convention Commission, 1968
Volume 138, Page 70   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

SUFFRAGE AND ELECTIONS

Upon inquiry to the secretary of state,
it was learned what person or group of
persons was responsible for instituting
the petitions on several of these ques-
tions. The Potomac River Compact was
placed on referendum largely through
the efforts of a group headed by former
Senator Walter Dorsey of St. Mary's
County. Amendments to the unemploy-
ment insurance laws were placed on
referendum as a result of certain labor
organizations. Woodrow F. Strong of
the AFL-CIO headed up this move-
ment. The Municipal Court legislation
was on referendum as a result of a move-
ment headed by James H. Pollack of
Baltimore City. In that same year the

League of Women Voters, under the
direction of Mrs. E. J. Satterthwaite,
filed petitions to place congressional re-
districting on referendum (Article 33).
James H. Pollack and Clark A. Robert-
son headed the drive to place the sav-
ings and loan bill (corporations) on
referendum. In 1964 the bill pertaining
to the Interracial Commission was
placed on referendum through the
efforts of a group known as the Mary-
land Petitions Commission, Incorpo-
rated. Samuel Setta of Easton and
Delegate C. Maurice Weidemeyer of
Annapolis acted as the coordinators for
this group.

INITIATIVE AND REFERENDUM PROVISIONS IN THE UNITED STATES

At the turn of the century, much in-
terest was shown in direct government
because of certain abuses which arose
in state legislatures. Powerful interest
groups had taken control of legislative
bodies in some states. During this
period provisions for initiative, referen-
dum, and recall began to appear in
state constitutions.
Initiative refers to measures proposed
by a petition of the electors and later
voted on at the polls. There are two
types of initiative, direct and indirect.
Direct initiative refers to measures
placed on the ballot by a mandatory
process without action by the legislature.
Indirect initiative refers to measures
sent to the legislature for its considera-
tion before being placed on the ballot.
If the legislature approves the measure,
it becomes law in the normal fashion.
If the legislature disapproves, the meas-
ure is placed on the ballot and may be
rejected or voted into law by the elec-
tors. If the legislature alters the pro-
posal, both the original and the altered
versions are placed on the ballot and
either may be voted into law.
70

Referendum refers to measures orig-
inated by the legislature and placed
upon the ballot for approval or rejec-
tion by the electors. Such measures may
be placed on the ballot by direction of
the legislature or by a petition of the
electors.
Recall authorizes voters to remove an
elected, or (in some states) appointed,
official by an adverse popular vote.
About half the states have adopted
one or more of the devices of initiative,
referendum, or recall. Twenty states
provide for both initiative and referen-
dum. Maryland and New Mexico are
the only states which provide for refer-
endum alone. In states which have
adopted initiative and referendum, con-
stitutional provisions are often common
to both. Generally the constitutions
provide expressly that these powers are
invoked by petition, but a few states
leave the method of invoking them to
be provided by law. Alaska, the first
state since 1918 to adopt a provision for
initiative and referendum, provides that
it be invoked by application, signed by

 

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Constitutional Revision Study Documents of the Constitutional Convention Commission, 1968
Volume 138, Page 70   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives