Mrs. Elsbeth Levy Bothe, Chairman
Committee on Miscellaneous Provisions
Constitutional Convention Commission
41 West Preston Street
Baltimore, Maryland 21201
Dear Mrs. Bothe :
With reference to my letter of August
6, and our telephone conversation of a
later date, I should like to clarify my
position on constitutional "autonomy" for
the University of Maryland. First of all,
I want to emphasize that I am talking
about a degree of autonomy, specifically,
power of management on the part of the
governing board.
In my letter, I reviewed constitutional
autonomy in Michigan, describing how
it had evolved over a period of more
than 100 years. While some points can
be made for constitutional recognition
for all state-supported institutions of
higher learning granting the baccalaure-
ate degree, a special case can be made for
the state university. In Maryland, the
case for the University of Maryland is
particularly strong.
It is strong because of its nature, func-
tion and complexity. It is the only pub-
lic university in the state, serving as the
university and the land-grant college with
1186
|
some support from the federal govern-
ment. The regents also serve as the State
Board of Agriculture. The University has
existed in some form since 1807; it has
been a comprehensive institution since
1921.
The University has had a degree of
statutory autonomy since 1952. Under
this statutory autonomy, it has grown in
quantity to one of the ten largest uni-
versities in the United States and, at the
same time, the quality has been improved.
It enjoys full accreditation by its regional
accrediting association and numerous
professional associations. It has been in-
vited to establish a Chapter of Phi Beta
Kappa, which is recognition for excel-
lence in the arts and sciences. The faculty
has attained distinction in many fields
and, owing to their stature, the Univer-
sity is engaged in a very substantial re-
search program sponsored, in the main,
by the federal government. The amount
of sponsored research and training
grants has increased from $1,279,133 in
1953-54 to $15,189,449 in 1965-66. These
and many other illustrations which could
be cited provide evidence of the progress
of the University under statutory auton-
omy.
|