ART. IV] CONSTITUTION. 49
in such Suit or Action, Issue, Presentment or Indict-
ment, to be transmitted to some other Court having jur-
isdiction in such case, for trial; but in all other cases of
Presentment or Indictment pending in any of the Courts
of Law in this State having jurisdiction thereof, in
addition to the suggestion in writing of either, of the
parties to such Presentment or Indictment that such
party cannot have a fair and impartial trial in the
Court in which the same may be pending, it shall be
necessary for the party making such suggestion to make
it satisfactorily appear to the Court that such sug-
gestion is true, or that there is reasonable ground for
the same; and thereupon the said Court shall order and
direct the Record of Proceedings in such Presentment
or Indictment to be transmitted to some other Court
having jurisdiction in such cases for trial; and such
right of removal shall exist upon suggestion in cases
when all the Judges of said Court may be disqualified,
under the provisions of this Constitution to sit in any
case; and said court to which the Record of Proceedings
in such Suit or Action, Issue, Presentment or Indict-
ment may be so transmitted, shall hear and determine
the same in like manner as if such Suit or Action, Issue,
Presentment or Indictment had been originally insti-
tuted therein; and the General Assembly shall make
such modification of existing law as may be necessary
to regulate and give force to this provision.]*
State v. Dashiell, 6 H. &J. 268. Wright v. Hamner, 5 Md. 370.
State v. Shillinger, 6 Md. 449- Manly v. State, 7 Md. 135. Brown
v. Gilmor, 8 Md. 322. Jerry v. Townsend, 9 Md. 145.
Hoshall v. Hoffacker, 11 Md. 364. Latrobe v. Mayor & C. C.
of Balto., 19 Md. 13. Griffin v. Leslie, 20 Md. 15. Price v.
Nesbitt, 29 Md. 263. Deford v. State, 30 Md. 179. Gambrill
v. Parker, 31 Md. 1. Cross v. Kent, 32 Md. 581. Hall v.
Schuchardt, 34 Md. 15. Kimball v. Harman, 34 Md. 401.
Hoyer v. Colton, 43 Md. 421. Geekie v. Harbourd, 52 Md. 460.
Trahern v. Hamill, 53 Md. 90. Desche v. Gies, 56 Md. 135.
Weiskittle v. State, 58 Md. 155. McMillan v. State, 68 Md.
307. Belair, etc., Club v. State, 74 Md. 297. Caledonian F. 1.
Co. v. Traub, 86 Md 93 City Pass. Ry. Co. Y. Nugent, 86
Md. 360. |
|
Sec. 9. The Judge or Judges of any Court may
appoint such officers for their respective Courts as may
be found necessary; and such officers of the Courts in
the City of Baltimore shall be appointed by the Judges
of the Supreme Bench of Baltimore City. It shall be
*Thus amended by Act of 1874, ch. 364, ratified by the people at November
election, 1875. |
Officers of
Court; how
appointed. |
|
 |
