clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Acts of the General Assembly, 1866
Volume 107, Page 1506   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

126
Crittenden Compromise or some amicable settlement of the
difficulties which then threatened the quiet of the country.
I think I did make some remarks at each of those conferen-
ces but not of the character contemplated by the interroga-
tory, to the best of my recollection. I think I did make a
speech in Potatoe Neck district sometime in the early part of
1861, probably during the canvass between Mr. Crisfield and
Mr. Henry, for Congress, and in the month of May, 1861,
made a speech at Snow Hill. My recollection is, that those
speeches at Potato Neck and Snow Hill were mainly upon
the question of bringing back the Seceded States by force of
arms, I argued against tint policy. The question was then
before the country upon a special election for Congress. I
do not recollect discussing the questions mentioned in the in-
terrogatory; I do recollect that the burden of my thoughts
was for the disastrous effects which I feared for the whole
country'if we should become involved in a civil war. If I
ever on any occasion, advocated I the Union of Maryland with
the South, it was only upon the condition that a separation
of the States should become inevitable and with the consent.
of the separating parties. After the policy of the government
was determined upon by Congress I made no political speech
during thereon.
6th Did you not know at the time yon made your speeches
at Potatoe Neck and Snow Hill that The Confederate author-
ities had taken armed possession of the navigation of the
Mississippi, seized and taken posse sion of the forts and arse-
nals and other proporty of the United States at Mobile. Pen-
sacola, Norfolk, Portsmouth and other places, and had, by
the power of their arms, captured Fort Sumpter, near
Charleston ?
This question to be prefaced by : You stated in your an-
swer to the previous question that the "burden of your
thoughts was for the disastrous effects which you feared for
the whole country if wo should become involved in a civil
war.",
A. As to the navigation of the Mississippi. I do not recol-,
lect. I was aware that the Southern States had seize dupon
the forts and arsenals within their boundaries and that Fort
Sumpter had been taken by ordered the Confederate Gov-
ernment, but I didn't consider that these acts necessarily
involved the United States Government in a civil war; espe-
cially as I had been informed (at the April term of the Cir
cuit Court of Somerset county and alter the seizure of many
of the Southern forts), ,by Judge Thomas A. Spence, that he-
had been informed that some days previous to the time when

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Acts of the General Assembly, 1866
Volume 107, Page 1506   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives