clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1967 Constitutional Convention
Volume 104, Volume 1, Debates 662   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
662 CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION OF MARYLAND [Nov. 10]
THE CHAIRMAN: May the Chair para-
phrase an answer just to see if he under-
stands it? You are saying that it was the
intention of the Committee that these sec-
tions, not referring to section I particu-
larly, but the remaining sections, 2 to 6,
inclusive, were intended to apply only to
acts of the General Assembly of Mary-
land?
DELEGATE KOSS: You are right.
THE CHAIRMAN: And secondly, that
if the Constitution authorizes the General
Assembly of Maryland to pass local legis-
lation, you do not intend these sections to
apply to such local legislation by the Gen-
eral Assembly, but you do intend to con-
sider the question again and perhaps re-
port different referendum provisions with
respect to public local legislation by the
General Assembly?
DELEGATE KOSS: Yes.
THE CHAIRMAN: Does the Chair fur-
ther understand that you do not intend
sections 2 to 6, inclusive, to apply in any
manner to local legislation enacted by local
subdivisions?
DELEGATE KOSS: That is correct.
THE CHAIRMAN: You are nodding
your head. Could you respond for the
record?
DELEGATE KOSS: That is correct.
THE CHAIRMAN: And does the Chair
further understand, therefore, that, regard-
less of what the meaning is, you do not
intend in section I to be referring in any
way, either by reserving or not reserving
the power to refer in any way to the power
of the people, as to referendum, with re-
spect to local laws enacted by local sub-
divisions?
DELEGATE KOSS: That is correct, Mr.
Chairman.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there a further
question on this point. Delegate Raley?
DELEGATE RALEY: Mr. Chairman,
did I understand you to say that the Elec-
tion Committee is going to restudy this,
come back on local laws, because what it
would mean, if there is nothing else—
THE CHAIRMAN: No. May I state this
again. The Committee, as I understand it,
is proceeding on the assumption that the
Committee on Local Government will rec-
ommend, and that this Convention will ap-
prove a provision prohibiting the General
Assembly from enacting local laws. If that
is done, they will not have to consider the
question again. If their assumption is in-
correct, and either the Committee on Local
Government does not so recommend, or this
Convention adopts provisions authorizing
the General Assembly to enact local legis-
lation, in that event and in that event only,
they will study the question further. Dele-
gate Raley.
DELEGATE RALEY: Mr. Chairman, I
think I know what Local Government is
going to recommend, but then what status
do the people in each of the local subdivi-
sions have for the power to petition?
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Koss has
stated the intention of the Committee in
presenting this recommendation is not in
any way to affect the question of refer-
endum of public local laws enacted, not by
the General Assembly, but by local sub-
divisions. This is not intended, either to
confer the power, or to withdraw the
power. The Chair is not expressing an
opinion on what the language does. I am
merely paraphrasing what I understand the
intent of the Committee to be. Delegate
Pullen.
DELEGATE PULLEN: Mr. Chairman,
I do not like to prolong this, but when you
say the people reserve unto themselves the
power of referendum, I think that means
people, whether locally or statewide or
whatnot. I cannot quite see the wisdom of
ignoring the impact of local legislation
upon people without having the right of
referendum.
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Koss.
DELEGATE KOSS: Mr. Chairman, can
I respond to this? I admit that past ex-
perience is no guarantee of what will hap-
pen in the future, but it is my understand-
ing this language is in the present Consti-
tution. I know of at least four jurisdictions
whose local governments enact local laws,
and I know that with this language in our
present Constitution, they retain to them-
selves the right to petition to referendum
laws passed by their local governing bodies.
THE CHAIRMAN: I understand that
Delegate Chabot's amendment is now
printed. I will ask the pages to distribute
it. I will ask the Clerk to read it. Please
mark this No. 2 so that we can refer to
them properly by number, Amendment No.
2. The Clerk will read the amendment.
READING CLERK: Amendment No. 2
to Committee Recommendation S&E-I, by
Delegate Chabot: on page I Section I The


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1967 Constitutional Convention
Volume 104, Volume 1, Debates 662   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives