clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1967 Constitutional Convention
Volume 104, Volume 1, Debates 3308   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

3308 CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION OF MARYLAND [Jan. 5]

(There was no response.)
The Clerk will record the vote.

There being 84 votes in the affirmative
and 2 in the negative, the motion is
carried and the amendment is adopted.

Are there any further amendments with
respect to the schedule of transitional
provisions?

Delegate Cardin.

DELEGATE CARDIN: Mr. Chairman,
I have no amendment to offer. However,
I wish to clarify something I questioned
yesterday in the informal questioning
period. In section 24, page 26, line 4, line
12, and line 15, the terminology "spouse"
is used. In line 4 it is used "the spouse".
In 12 and 15 it is "his spouse". I would
like to make certain for the record that
in the event the judge is of feminine
gender it would also mean "her spouse".

THE CHAIRMAN: Which page is this?
DELEGATE CARDIN: Page 26.

THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Penniman
is not here. I hesitate to speak for the
Committee on Style, but it seems to me
that there was a statement made earlier
that the pronoun "his" means his or hers,
as appropriate.

Delegate Hardwicke, can you make a
statement about that?

DELEGATE HARDWICKE: It was our
intention that the phrase "his spouse"
should embrace the phrase "her spouse",
and by that was meant to include either
gender.

THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Cardin.
DELEGATE CARDIN: Thank you.

I hope that wherever in the constitution
the masculine gender is used it will be con-
sidered to embrace all genders. I refer
especially to Article I.

THE CHAIRMAN: That is true as to
legislation. I doubt that Article I is ap-
plicable by its own force, but I think the
rule you have stated was stated by the
Chairman of the Committee on Style. It is
certainly the Chair's understanding as the
proper application throughout the Consti-
tution.

Delegate Churchill Murray.

DELEGATE E. C. MURRAY: I have a
letter from the President of Zonta Inter-
national Club objecting that we have not
included the female sex.

Am I not correct in telling her that
wherever the word "person" or, for that
matter "him" is used, it is intended to
refer to both sexes?

THE CHAIRMAN: That is correct.

Are there any further amendments to —
Delegate Rybczynski.

DELEGATE RYBCZYNSKI: I would
appreciate your calling up Amendment Z,
as in "zebra".

THE CHAIRMAN: Amendment Z. The
pages will please distribute it.

Delegate Koss.

DELEGATE KOSS: May I impose on
the Convention, only because there seems
to be a hiatus, and following Delegate
Murray's remarks, tell about the letter I
received? I cannot resist a temptation to
relate a story which has always been one
of my favorites.

In 1961 I was privileged to be a member
of a group that was invited to the White
House to be greeted by President Kennedy.
He told us of the days when suffragettes
were picketing the White House for recog-
nition of their rights, and when the police
came and the leader was hauled off, her
last words to the girls who were with her
were: "Don't worry, girls. Pray to the
Lord. She will take care of us."

(Laughter.)

THE CHAIRMAN: This will be Amend-
ment No. 15.

Delegate Harry Taylor.

DELEGATE H. TAYLOR: A point of
personal privilege, Mr. Chairman.

THE CHAIRMAN: State your privilege.

DELEGATE H. TAYLOR: Robert J.
Martineau, our Secretary, has been most
efficient and most accommodating to every-
body in the Convention, and this is just an
example of how far this gentleman has
gone to do whatever any delegate has re-
quested.

This is a note, and it is dated January 4,
to Mr. John W. White, Delegate:

"Sir:

"You ask if I could reverse the picture
film to show 135 black delegates and five
white. Now, I ask you, sir, would that not
have a negative effect on the Convention?
And would you not have to change your
name to Delegate Black.



 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1967 Constitutional Convention
Volume 104, Volume 1, Debates 3308   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives