clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1967 Constitutional Convention
Volume 104, Volume 1, Debates 2343   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

[Dec. 13] DEBATES 2343

We thought that maybe it might be assigned
cases where juries would be required.

We wrote this section giving the legisla-
ture the right to reduce the number of
jurors in the District Court, or in any other
civil court, for reasons best known to them,
down to six.

I might say I have tried a number of
civil cases in Virginia and they have a
civil jury down there of seven, and it works
very well, but I am not urging Maryland to
adopt that.

I think the amendment does no particular
harm. Only I think it is unnecessary. I
think the provision, as we have written it.
is just as good as the amendment, and I
think it is clearer than the amendment, and
I would urge that the amendment be de-
feated and that our section stand as it is.

THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Dorsey.

DELEGATE DORSEY: Mr. President, I
feel that this amendment simply guarantees
to anyone in a civil case that he will have
twelve men try his case in the superior
court.

Now, yesterday this Committee of the
whole guaranteed a unanimous verdict by
twelve men in criminal cases. I really be-
lieve that this body wants to do the same
thing in the superior court in civil matters.
A man can be charged on information for
assault and battery, tried before a jury of
twelve men, found guilty and fined one
dollar. For that same assault he can be sued
for a hundred thousand dollars or more. He
can be stripped of his home and all his
property by a verdict, but instead of having
twelve men to try his case, he will have to
submit it to a jury of six if the legislature
so prescribes instead of a jury of twelve.

This simply guarantees that in the supe-
rior court in all civil cases a person will
have a right to have his case submitted to a
jury of twelve men.

THE CHAIRMAN: Is there any further
discussion ?

(TI) ere was no response.)
Are you ready for the question ?
(Call for the question.)
The Clerk will ring the quorum bell.

T,he question arises on the adoption of
Amendment No. 26 to Committee Recom-
mendation R&P-1.

A vote Aye is a vote in favor of Amend-
ment No. 26. A vote No is a vote against.

Cast your votes.

Has every delegate voted? Does any dele-
gate desire to change his vote ?

(There was no response.)
The Clerk will record the vote.

There being 75 votes in the affirmative
and 45 in the negative, the motion carries.
The amendment is adopted.

Delegate Beatrice Miller, do you still de-
sire to offer your Amendment V ?

DELEGATE B. MILLER: No, Mr.
Chairman.

THE CHAIRMAN: Thank you very
much.

(Applause.)

THE CHAIRMAN: At the request of
the Chair, Delegate Willoner has agreed
to consider his Minority Report and the
amendment in support of it as withdrawn
as an amendment to Recommendation
R&P-1, with the understanding that it will
be submitted as a minority report and
amendment to Recommendation R&P-2. This
will permit the Committee of the Whole
to act finally with respect to R&P-1 before
we adjourn for dinner and enable us to
get it to the Committee very promptly.

The Chair wants to thank Delegate Wil-
loner for his consideration and also Dele-
gate Kiefer, Chairman of the Committee,
for acquiescing.

Are there any other amendments to any
sections of Committee Recommendation
R&P-1?

(There was no response.)

The question now arises on the approval
of Committee Recommendation R&P-1 as
amended.

A vote Aye is a vote in favor of the
approval of Recommendation R&P-1 as
amended. A vote No is a vote against.

Cast your votes.

Has every delegate voted? Does any dele-
gate desire to change his vote?

(There was no response.)
The Clerk will record the vote.

There being 121 votes in the affirmative
and none in the negative, the motion car-
ries. Committee Recommendation R&P-1 as
amended is adopted.

The Chair cannot help but refraining,
adding that this is a point he thought we
would never reach.



 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1967 Constitutional Convention
Volume 104, Volume 1, Debates 2343   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  Cannot perform flastmod(): Win32 Error Code = 2

Maryland State Archives