clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1967 Constitutional Convention
Volume 104, Volume 1, Debates 2001   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

[Dec. 8] DEBATES 2001

DELEGATE J. CLARK (presiding):
Amendment No. 14 is divided into two
parts, the first part being lines 1 through
3 and the second part being lines 5 through
7. The amendment is open for discussion.

The Chair recognizes Delegate Marion.

DELEGATE MARION: Mr. Chairman,
if the first part of this now divided ques-
tion is adopted, and the second part is not
adopted, do we not end up with an incon-
sistency in that we have used county elec-
tions in two places in the Committee Rec-
ommendation, but if the Committee of the
Whole should take that action —

DELEGATE J. CLARK (presiding):
It would mean we would have a standard
situation over all the State rather than
what is now divided.

Delegate Marion.

DELEGATE MARION: Mr. Chairman,
my point is this: If that portion of the
amendment in lines 1 through 3 were to
be adopted, it would mean inserting county
officials in line 22 in the second paragraph
of section 7 of the Committee Recommen-
dation. But if lines 5 through 7 of the
amendment were to be defeated, that
would mean the word "county" would re-
main in line 27 in the third paragraph of
the Committee Recommendation, thus
creating an inconsistency. Therefore, I
wonder whether or not the question is
truly divisible.

DELEGATE DUKES: If there is any
question, I would be happy to have the
sponsor strike the second part.

DELEGATE J. CLARK (presiding):
The Parliamentarian advises me that there
are two different questions in the amend-
ment and that they certainly can be voted
on separately, even if they do create an
inconsistency.

The Chair recog-nizes Delegate Gallagher.

DELEGATE GALLAGHER: Mr. Chair-
man, ladies and gentlemen of the House.
Would the Chair give permission to the
Baltimore City delegates in the Committee
of the Whole to assemble outside in the
lounge for a few moments to discuss one
aspect of this entire matter?

DELEGATE J. CLARK (presiding):
If there is no objection, that permission is
granted.

The Chair recognizes Delegate Byrnes.

DELEGATE BYRNES: Mr. Chairman,
can we have a quorum call so we can round
up the ones who are around?

DELEGATE J. CLARK (presiding):
The Clerk will ring the quorum bell.

The absence of a quorum has been sug-
gested. Would everyone present indicate
their presence? You did not suggest the
absence of a quorum. Just ring the bell.
The roll call will not be necessary. Ab-
sence of a quorum was not suggested. The
gentleman just asked that we ring the
quorum bell.

The Chair recog-nizes Delegate Schloeder.

DELEGATE SCHLOEDER: Mr. Chair-
man, now that the City deleg-ation is meet-
ing in caucus, I wonder if the majority of
the Committee could have some sort of
colonial act or legislative act to sit in on
those proceedings?

DELEGATE J. CLARK (presiding):
Does anyone desire to speak on the amend-
ment?

Delegate Macdonald.

DELEGATE MACDONALD: Mr. Chair-
man.

DELEGATE J. CLARK (presiding):
The Chair recognizes Delegate Macdonald.

DELEGATE MACDONALD: In view of
the fact that the very important contingent
of this Committee of the Whole is not
present, I would move that the Committee
rise for the purpose of asking the Con-
vention to take a short recess until our
delegates from Baltimore City return. I
think this question before the Convention
is important and that they should be here
to hear the very valuable debate.

DELEGATE J. CLARK (presiding):
The Chair would suggest they will be only
a very few moments probably and if we
wait a minute, I think they will be right
back here.

The Chair recog-nizes Delegate Kiefer.

DELEGATE KIEFER: Mr. Chairman,
while the Baltimore City delegation is out,
do you suppose it would be appropriate at
this point for us to submit a little amend-
ment that Delegates Weidemeyer, Hostetter
and I have had in the back of our pockets
a long1 time, namely, to re-establish the
monarchy?

DELEGATE J. CLARK (presiding):
Delegate Scanlan.

DELEGATE SCANLAN: In this inter-
lude, I can report that for the first time in
this Convention my colleague, Delegate
Weidemeyer has become shy. He has a per-



 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1967 Constitutional Convention
Volume 104, Volume 1, Debates 2001   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  Cannot perform flastmod(): Win32 Error Code = 2

Maryland State Archives