1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
16
19
20
21

are of such significance that they ought to be expressed
in the Contitution and the minority contend that this is one
t>
of them.
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Hostetter?
*
DELEGATE HOSTETTER: Has not this particular amend-
ment and proposal already ben set forth as the policy of
the State through court rulidgs?
DELEGATE BOTHE: The policy of the State set forth
as you mention I think only occurs as you mention only in on'i
place, in Article C of the Code which is an anti-labor

injunction statute passed in 1939.
There is a statement of state policy but,
of course, it has no effectuation and it is only a right
in terms of the Court's being precluded from enjoining
labor activity.
I would not say that the broad scope has been
accepted in any laws or court decisions.
ik4
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Hostetter.
DELEGATE HOSTETTER: Has there been any denial
in the state to organize by law? In other words, has
a specific law ever been passed in the state denying