1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

the case of this Elwood versus Ocean City and approximately
this same case came up in which public peace was discussed,
curfew orders and violators were held. it was a question
of whether they would be legitimately held. The case
essentially defined what was public peace, what were the
public interests involved and made the decision that in
this case the holding was lawful, in which they made tem-
porary holding but did not grant bail because of the
Ocean City riots.
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Scanlan.
DELEGATE SCANLAN: In other words, I gather
your answer to my question was yes.
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Grant.
DELEGATE GRANT; That is right, yes, under well
defined legal concepts.
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Bothe.
DELEGATE BOTHE; Delegate Grant, is it your
intention by substituting the word "peace" for "safety"
to make the provision more or less restrictive?
THE CHAIRJIAN: Delegate Grant.
DELEGATE GRANT: The answer is yes, it is to