1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Bothe, in view of the
statements by Delegate Willoner and your reply, the
Chair would like to ask a question or two for the infor-
mation of the Committee on Style.
Your amendment in lines 3 and 4 says "evidence
secured in violation of these provisions."
Can you indicate what is referred to by the words
"these provisions"? In other words, does it refer to the
whole of section 4, or does it refer only to lines 43 to
the end?
DELEGATE BOTHE: Mr. Chairman, it would refer
to the whole of section 4. However, as has been pointed
out by me and by Delegate Willoner, the possibility of a
private citizen being able to obtain a warrant is virtually
nonexistent.
THE CHAIRMAN: That is why I asked the question --
because the first part of section 4, as I read it, has
nothing whatsoever to do with warrants, and if your answer
is that evidence secured in violation of these provisions
means, for instance, an invasion of privacy as stated in
41, or interception of communications as stated in 39 and