1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

in Mappe versus Ohio because it involved a situation involv-l-
inq the 5th Amendment, and he thought it was a matter where
that evidence should be excluded.
This is a very, very complicated case. Remember,
a woman never loses an argument. At best, she fails to make
her point. I hope that she has failed to make her point
and that you will reject this amendment.
THE CHAIRMAN: Any further discussion? Are you
ready for the question?
The Clerk will ring the quorum bell.
Delegate Bennett.
DELEGATE BENNETT: Mr. Chairman, our distinguished
chairman has given us some beautiful generalities here
this evening on women and various and other things, but
l all this amendment says is: Do you mean what you say?
Do you mean to disclose or to refuse? Do you mean to dis-
close?
If you mean to say that there are certain kinds
of searches and seizures that should not be allowed and
then to enforce that, you have got to provide that th
cviGnce so obtained cannot be J-itroduced. That is '"