|
1
2 3 4 5 6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 |
objection to having boards for all of them. It might
be better. That isn't the point at all. What Mrs. Maurer,
and I think those who are interested, or all of us are dri-
ving at is this, that we wanted the board, we want the
chief professional officer not to be selected politically
or by any device except by a board.
Now, we don't care if all the rest of this
goes into that or not.
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Pullen, the Chair
suggests to you the first sentence in 4.20 as rewritten in
the amendment would not apply at all to the state public
school system or institutions of higher education.
Delegate James.
DELEGATE JAMES: Mr. Chairman, that is in 4.21.
The education people are very well taken care of there
in this article. They are in a very preferred position, if
you would read the article.
THE CHAIRMAN: That is what I understood Delegate
Maurer to point out some time ago. This section. Delegate
Pullen, if amended, as provided in the amendment offered
by Delegate Maurer, would not apply to the state public
school system or to the institutions of higher education. |