|
1
2 3 4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 |
to repeat the exceptance of both divisions.
THE CHAIRMAN: .I don't think so. I think her
amendment is to leave that to law. She is not attempting
to fix that in the Constitution, as I understand it.
Is that correct. Delegate Maurer?
DELEGATE MAURER: Yes, sir. That would come
under 4.21,when we debate 4.21, if we pass 4.20, is that
not correct? Because the chief administrative officers are
not dealt with in 4.20.
THE CHAIRMAN: That is correct.
Delegate Pullen.
DELEGATE PULLEN: May I make the point to my
colleague that if that is left in there, without that
protective device, the purpose, the appointment could be
made by some other agency, and by provision of the
legislature.
THE CHAIRMAN: That is exactly what Delegate
Maurer intends as the Chair understands it.
Delegate Pullen, you will have the opportunity
to offer an amendment to that. That is the effect of the
section at the present time, I might point out. |