sure that he has really done his homework, because part of
the statement which was quoted, and I am now reading it,
said, it was the recommendation of this Commission, the Eney
Commission, which submitted the carefully researched draft
instrument to this Convention, that the office of Comptroller
be appointive under the Governor. But if he had read that
document closely, on page 149, he would have noted the
language wherein there was a caveat put in there. It said,
although it can be argued that control of the actual
disbursement' of State funds should not be in the Chief
Executive -- I think that is what we are doing, and since the
Governor also indicated that he was in favor of a continuation
of the Board of Public Works, we will change the name, he
will have control, and I think he has no reason to object.
I am unhappy but I don't see why he should be.
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Fornos?
DELEGATE FORNOS: I want to speak in favor of the
Amendment.
THE CHAIRMAN: I am sorry.
Any Delegate desire to speak in opposition?
Delegate Penniman?