1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

you commented upon this, but I was confused at that time,
and I am confused now.
Wouldn't it be in order, Mr. President, to call
for a reconsideration of the vote of the Committee of the
Whole on EB-I as amended, without getting back to the
amendment to the Committee Report EB-I?
THE PRESIDENT: I am not sure I understood your
I question. Would you state that again? Would it be in
order to move to reconsider what?
DELEGATE JOHNSON: The question is, Mr. Presi-
dent, could we not move for reconsideration of the action
of the Committee of the Whole on EB-I as amended, namely,
the 68 to 6 8 vote, without going all the way back to the
previous vote, that is, the original Amendment No. I to
Committee Report EB-I?
THE PRESIDENT: Yes, indeed, if that was the
motion, but that was not the motion. The motion was to re-
consider the vote by which the amendment was adopted, and
'' the Chair ruled that in order to do that, that the motion
would have to embrace both votes. The mover of the motion
obviously did not desire to submit a motion in the form