|
1
2 3 4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12 13 14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 |
might have had behind it, because of the time pressure, be-
cause it was believed that it might not have been in order
for us to leave a memorialized statement for. the General
Assembly. Therefore, it is withdrawn.
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Jett.
DELEGATE JETT: Mr. Chairman, fellow Delegates: I rise to oppose this suggestion. I feel
that it is absolutely my duty to do so, having sat on the
General Provisions Committee and listened to the testimony
and heard the debates concerning this matter.
It is my sincere feeling, and has been, that
this is not a Constitutional matter. It is a matter that
belongs in the statutes. The legislature has not been
unmindful of this problem. It has made a very good attempt
to tackle the problem, and when I say this, I say to you
that what we are doing here is not putting heart and soul
in the Constitution. I think we are putting meaningless
phrases and hot air in it. There is no way that I can
conceive of that anyone could oppose the concept of this
thing, or any way you could oppose any other concept.
The consumer we want protected, but I say to you |