|
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
12
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 |
and Delegate Henderson and others.
I wish to draw a very simple parallel,
and ask that this be considered carefully, particularly
by those who are not lawyers, but who have expressed
concern about the concentration of the judicial power in
the judiciary, free of legislative tampering by use of the
word "exclusively."
Assume for the moment that your business is an
insurance business, and it is an incorporated business, with
the officers and usual Board of Directors.
Is it not logical, and is it not the best method
of procedure, to permit those officers or that Board
of Directors to determine the necessity of an additional
assistant in the activity of that business?
For example, you want to expand and take on
another line of insurance, assuming for the moment
that it is home owners liability or fire or some other
specialized type of insurance activity.BR>
Is it not the best way of approach that
when the need for that expansion is there, that the
officers and the Board of Directors determine that this
|
