1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

DELEGATE DUKES: Would I conclude, if your
answer in the negative is correct, there is no provision
for such court under this article?
DELEGATE MUDD: No provision for what?
DELEGATE DUKES: For the small claims court
with an informal system. Could there be none under this
article?
DELEGATE MUDD: Absolutely yes, it could be.
I an not prepared to say it would be operated under rules
different from those of the court of which it was a func-
tional division*
DELEGATE DUKES: Delegate Bamberger's last
question, as I recall, dealt with whether or not the basic
intention in having functional divisions as a function of
rule making rather than legislative. You felt the courts
were in better position to determine when a functional di-
vision was necessary, is that right?
DELEGATE MUDD: Yes.
DELEGATE DUKES; And the Chair, I believe,
stated a question in response to Delegate Willoner's
inquiry about any difference if there was any between