|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 |
the pages would deal with Montgomery County. But the
conclusion of our committee was that the problem in Mont-
gomery County, if there is one, regarding Orphans Court
jurisdiction being taken over by the Superior Court, was
not in the system, but in the administration.
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Rybczynski.
DELEGATE RYBCZYNSKI: I have a very pointed
question.
If we accept the fact that functional division
would be a good thing for the district court, why is not
functional division also applicable to the superior court?
DELEGATE MUDD: It is so provided for in
section 5.08.
DELEGATE RYBCZYNSKI: Sorry; right.
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Clagett.
DELEGATE MUDD: I am glad I got one easy
question*
DELEGATE CLAGETT: Delegate Mudd, with respect
to section 5.11, I note that the principal difference between
the majority and minority is that the commissioners would be
appointed by the court, rather than as provided by law.
DELEGATE MUDD: Yes. |