|
|
13,858
|
|
1
|
rule, in which event, there would be no concurrent power
|
|
2
|
by the General Assembly as, for instance, the power of
|
|
3
|
the Court of Appeals to prescribe by rule for the method
|
|
4
|
of selecting lawyermembers of nominating commissions or
|
|
5
|
for secret ballots for lawyers on retention of judges.
|
|
6
|
Some of those matters are specifically designated
|
|
7
|
to be prescribed by rule and not to be subject to the
|
|
8
|
concurrent power of the legislature to prescribe by law.
|
|
9
|
There are a very limited number of those cases, but they
|
|
10
|
do exist.
|
|
11
|
Delegate Weidemeyer.
|
|
12
|
DELEGATE WEIDEMEYER: Thank you, Mr. President.
|
|
13
|
THE PRESIDENT: Any further discussion?
|
|
14
|
Delegate Burdette.
|
|
15
|
DELEGATE BURDETTE: It seems to me that the
|
|
16
|
nroblem here that Delegate Weidemeyer has identified, but
|
|
17
|
it is very hard to follow from this language, is in
|
|
18
|
lines 31 and 32.
|
|
19
|
As I understand the language, the General
|
|
20
|
Assemblv by law shall have concurrent power. That
|
|
21
|
strikes me as quite different from saying in the
|