|
|
13,855
|
|
1
|
DELEGATE JOHNSON: Doesn't it say what you
|
|
2
|
purport it to say without the amendment?
|
|
3
|
THE PRESIDENT: Delegate Marion.
|
|
4
|
DELEGATE MARION: If you are asking me is it
|
|
5
|
not true that it makes no substantive change, I would say
|
|
6
|
yes.
|
|
7
|
THE PRESIDENT: Delegate Johnson.
|
|
8
|
DELEGATE JOHNSON: No further questions.
|
|
9
|
THE PRESIDENT: Delegate Weidemeyer.
|
|
10
|
DELEGATE WEIDEMEYER: Delegate Marion, in
|
|
11
|
view of the first sentence of Section 5.03, which confers
|
|
12
|
upon the Court of Appeals the power to prescribe rules and
|
|
13
|
in view of the fact that that is a new departure, as far
|
|
14
|
as I can recall constitutionally, they had no power to
|
|
15
|
prescribe rules before and the only power that was
|
|
16
|
derived from act of the legislature, and now specifically
|
|
17
|
in the first sentence, when this gives it to them
|
|
18
|
constitutionally, and we definitely understood that it
|
|
19
|
was to be a concurrent power of rule-making.
|
|
20
|
When you put in The General Assembly shall
|
|
21
|
bv law have concurrent power to regulate matters subject
|