|
|
13,766
|
|
1
|
where I lost you.
|
|
2
|
DELEGATE BURGESS: I can see arguments on both
|
|
3
|
sides. However, since there is a question of interpretation
|
|
4
|
arising in some minds I wonder if we might clarify it.
|
|
5
|
The "any", I feel, modifies "limitations" , but there was the
|
|
6
|
suggestion here that "any" would mean unlimited although
|
|
7
|
this was suggested as a distinct probability.
|
|
8
|
THE PRESIDENT: I am disturbed at your suggestion
|
|
9
|
because it seems to me that it raises a question that I did
|
|
10
|
not think existed. It was my understanding from the
|
|
11
|
discussion on the floor that the purpose of this clause was
|
|
12
|
to indeed to give the General Assembly in a sense unlimited,
|
|
13
|
except as limited by the word "reasonable", power to
|
|
14
|
prescribe limitations, any they chose to prescribe. Is
|
|
15
|
that not the situation?
|
|
16
|
DELEGATE BURGESS: That is correct. With that
|
|
17
|
interpretation I am sure that all minds will be put at ease
|
|
18
|
in this area, if that is spread on the record and is
|
|
19
|
considered as the legislative intent, if you will, here,
|
|
20
|
I am sure everybody would be satisfied.
|
|
21
|
THE PRESIDENT: So far as the Chair is concerned,
|